Does income growth relocate ecological footprint
By Ahmet Atıl Aşıcı, S. Acar. 2016
210 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91e7e0fa483321aa016baefc2af94246ca863935
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Avik Sinha
- Olimpia Neagu
- Arshian Sharif
- M. Destek
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- Ilhan Ozturk
- G. Uzuner
- O. Baris-Tuzemen
In Environmental Engineering
- Olimpia Neagu
- Avik Sinha
- Arshian Sharif
- M. Destek
- Ilhan Ozturk
- O. Baris-Tuzemen
- G. Uzuner
- Muhammad Shahbaz
Citations in the corpus
- Economic Complexity and Ecological Footprint: Evidence from the Most Complex Economies in the World (2020, background): “As, ici and Acar (2016) [45] confirmed the inverted U-shaped relationship between income and the ecological footprint of production for a panel of 116 countries from 2004 to 2008.”
- Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: Evidence from Quantile ARDL approach (2020, background): “9 [43] have investigated whether the EKC hypothesis is valid for 116 countries using data from 2004-2008.”
- Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries (2020, background): “This segment of the findings 1 resonates with the results obtained by Bagliani et al. (2008) for non-energy EF and Charfeddine 2 and Mrabet (2017) for non-oil exporting MENA countries. However, this finding contradicts the 3 findings of Wang et al. (2013), Aşıcı and Acar (2018), Ulucak and Bilgili (”