The green economy agenda: business as usual or transformational discourse?
By P. Ferguson. 2015
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ddef1cceff9ca9df942f752a66dbb2884315b4c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- Future green economies and regional development: a research agenda (2017, unknown): “For example, Bina (2013) divides these into three categories: ‘business-asusual’, ‘greening’ and ‘all change’, while Ferguson (2015) similarly has ‘conventional pro-growth’, ‘selective growth’ and ‘limits to growth’ (Table 1).”
- Integrating the green economy, circular economy and bioeconomy in a strategic sustainability framework (2021, background): “Therefore, they can be understood as ‘narratives’ (as defined in D’Amato, 2021), serving an ancillary role, rather than a substitute one, for sustainable development (Borel-Saladin and Turok, 2013; Ferguson, 2015; Luederitz et al., 2017).”
- Redefining green growth within planetary boundaries (2018, background): “…more sustainable consumption and production, but still disregards ecological limits from ecosystem to the Earth system (Anderson and Bows-Larkin, 2013; Dale et al., 2016; D’Alisa et al., 2014; Ferguson, 2015; Hayden, 2014; Jackson, 2011; Lorek and Spangenberg, 2014; Santarius, 2012; Spash, 2014).”