A psychometric evaluation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report measures

By A. Cogswell, L. Alloy, Manfred H. M. Dulmen, D. Fresco. 2006

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8bac362e48906d8fff70c82bc6fe5c292c3f9ba5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. D. Krupić
2. Valerija Križanić
3. S. Ručević
4. A. Gračanin
5. Philip J. Corr
6. N. McNaughton
7. Colin G. DeYoung
8. Luke D. Smillie

In Clinical Psychology

1. Philip J. Corr

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. D. Krupić
2. Valerija Križanić
3. S. Ručević
4. A. Gračanin
5. Philip J. Corr
6. Luke D. Smillie
7. C. Jackson

Citations in the corpus

• Five reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) of personality questionnaires: Comparison, validity and generalization (2016, background): “Available data on convergent validity of the RST questionnaires are limited to comparison of two questionnaires (e.g. Caci, Deschaux, & Baylé, 2007; Cogswell et al., 2006; Davis et al., 2007; Dufey, Fernández, & Mourgues, 2011; Knyazev, Slobodskaya, & Wilson, 2004; Krupić & Corr, 2014; Sava &…”