Going to the MALL: Mobile Assisted Language Learning

By Bob Godwin-Jones. 2006

420 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8b23df8c751d1071671da1b1e8f6c00e9cec4613

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone (2008, background): “…EFL learners with large exposure to the target content as learners can do self-learning anytime, anywhere with the assistance provided by mobile technology (e.g., Norbrook & Scott 2003; Thornton & Houser 2003, 2004, 2005; McNicol 2004; Naismith et al. 2005; Roschelle et al. 2005; Chinnery 2006).”
Mobile apps for language learning (2011, background): “Five years ago in LLT, George Chinnery (2006) surveyed the state of mobile language learning.”
Perceived Convenience in an Extended Technology Acceptance Model: Mobile Technology and English Learning for College Students. (2012, background): “Wireless networks with functions of immediate connection and transmission (Chinnery, 2006) enable a learner’s interactions with learning content, peers and instructors to foster a meaningful knowledge construction and to get the updated”
Mobile English learning: An evidence-based study with fifth graders (2011, background): “Also, it is not yet possible to respond in real-time to the learners ’ actions in the same way a good teacher would (Chinnery, 2006).”
Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes (2014, background): “Despite the appearance of over 600 MALL publications over the past twenty years, including three major overviews of the ﬁ eld (Chinnery, 2006; Kukulska-Hulme & Shield, 2008; Burston, 2014), no study has systematically evaluated the learning outcomes of MALL implementation projects.”