Primaries and the New Hampshire Effect

By T. Klumpp, Mattias Polborn. 2006

305 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Best-of-Three Contest Experiments: Strategic versus Psychological Momentum (2012, unknown): “Konrad and Kovenock (2009) use an all-pay auction, Ferrall and Smith (1999) use a rank-order tournament, and Klumpp and Polborn (2006) use a Tullock contest.”
A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments (2014, background): “Also, see Sheremeta (2010a, b). who analyze a best-of-three contest designed to gain insight into the so-called New Hampshire effect (Klumpp and Polborn 2006).”
Experimental comparison of multi-stage and one-stage contests (2009, background): “Such contests have been studied by Harris and Vickers (1985, 1987), Klumpp and Polborn (2006), and Konrad and Kovenock (2009).”
Momentum and Social Learning in Presidential Primaries (2010, unknown): “On the candidate side, Klumpp and Polborn (2006) specify a model in which an early primary victory increases the likelihood of victory for one candidate and creates an asymmetry in campaign spending that furthers this advantage.”
An experimental investigation of Colonel Blotto games (2011, unknown): “Interest in the game is derived from its wide potential for application, including to problems in military and systems defense (Blackett, 1954, 1958; Shubik and Weber, 1981; Clark and Konrad 2007; Powell 2007, Hausken, 2008; and Kovenock and Roberson, 2008), advertising (Friedman, 1958), research an”