Error processing and the rostral anterior cingulate: an event-related fMRI study.

By Kent A. Kiehl, Peter F. Liddle, J. Hopfinger. Psychophysiology, 2000

696 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a25b6f30bf0b429f9f95cdd679373c2307726e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Limbic abnormalities in affective processing by criminal psychopaths as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. (2001, background): “These latter regions are generally associated with semantic and decision-making processes (Kiehl et al 2000).”
Anterior cingulate activity during error and autonomic response (2005, background): “Detection of response conflict is important in monitoring performance (Botvinick et al., 2001), and it is noteworthy that neuroimaging and ERP data show dACC sensitivity to errors in performance (Kiehl et al., 2000; Menon et al., 2001; Dehaene et al., 1994).”
The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task (2005, background): “…neuronal activity, particularly with reference to probing ACC function (e.g., Braver et al., 2001; Carter et al., 1998; Garavan et al., 2002, 2003; Kiehl et al., 2000; Ullsperger and von Cramon, 2001), have long been recognized and error trials are typically excluded from analyses in…”
Neural development of selective attention and response inhibition (2003, methodology): “Studies using the go no-go paradigm in normal adults suggest that the anterior cingulate is not involved directly in response inhibition, but rather in monitoring performance (Braver et al., 2001; Kiehl et al., 2000; Liddle et al., 2001).”
The Timing of Action-Monitoring Processes in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex (2002, background): “In support of these dipole models, studies using functional MRI have shown increased activation of the ACC during error trials relative to correct trials (Kiehl et al., 2000; Carter et al., 1998).”
Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks (2007, background): “Garavan et al. 1999 X Go/No-go 13 Garavan et al. 2002 X Go/No-go 16 Hazeltine et al. 2000 X I–C 4 Iacoboni et al. 1996 X I–C 2 Iacoboni et al. 1998 X I–C 3 Kiehl et al. 2000 X Go/No-go 8 Konishi et al. 1998 X Go/No-go 10 Konishi et al. 1999 X Go/No-go 2 Leung et al. 2000 X I–C 16 Liddle et al. 200”
Prefrontal Cell Activities Related to Monkeys' Success and Failure in Adapting to Rule Changes in a Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Analog (2006, background): “fMRI studies have shown an activity increase in error trials in the dorsolateral PFC as well as in the medial PFC (Carter et al., 1998; Kiehl et al., 2000).”
The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies. (2002, background): “Interestingly, fMRI research had previously indicated that the rostral ACC was engaged during error trials [22].”
Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent. (2008, methodology): “In fMRI studies of response inhibition, pre-SMA activationhasbeenaconsistentfinding(Bellgrove,Hester,GBlasi et al., 2006; Braver et al., 2001; Fassbender et al., 2004; Kelly et al., 2004; Kiehl et al., 2000; Liddle et al., 2001; Mostofsky et al., 2003; Rubia et al., 2001).”
Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection (2003, background): “The rostral anterior cingulate seems to be responsible for error detection (Kiehl et al., 2000; Menon et al., 2001; Braver et al., 2001; Ullsperger and van Cramon, 2001), while the more caudal parts appear to be involved in conflict detection (Carter et al.”
Error‐related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task (2001, background): “To our knowledge, only one study has examined whole-brain event-related activity during error processing [Kiehl et al., 2000], and only one study has examined whole-brain activation during response inhibition [Garavan et al., 1999].”
Mapping the functional connectivity of anterior cingulate cortex (2007, background): “On the other hand, the segregation of ACC into affective and cognitive subdivisions has been largely supported by fMRI studies demonstrating the presence of rostral and caudal distinctions, respectively (Bush et al., 2000; Haas et al., 2006; Kiehl et al., 2000; Milham and Banich, 2005; Van Veen and ”