The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies.
By Vincent van Veen, Cameron S. Carter. Physiology and Behavior, 2002
1,306 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f626beb2a4d68f402d513e5168957dc6a09214e5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Cameron S. Carter
- Michael P. Milham
- F. X. Castellanos
- Matthew Botvinick
- Vincent van Veen
- J. Cohen
- Lucina Q. Uddin
- Bharat B. Biswal
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- B. Atkinson
- Cameron S. Carter
- Vincent van Veen
- J. Cohen
- Britta K. Hölzel
- David R. Vago
- Daniel S. Margulies
- Zev Schuman-Olivier
Citations in the corpus
- Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study (2005, background): “The more anterior location of the ACC region that was activated to response conflict is consistent with the location of ACC activation in other studies eliciting response conflict (Botvinick et al., 1999; Bunge et al., 2002; Casey et al., 2000; Van Veen et al., 2001).”
- Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data (2007, methodology): “…and dipole-modeling studies have consistently shown that this component might be generated by the ACC (Dehaene et al., 1994; Holroyd, Dien, & Coles, 1998; Miltner et al., 2003; Nieuwenhuis, Yeung, van den Wildenberg, & Ridderinkhof, 2003; van Veen & Carter, 2002b; Yeung, Botvinick, & Cohen, 2004).”
- Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. (2009, background): “…and ventral to the more dorsal region of anterior cingulate cortex implicated inmany studies of workingmemory, response conflict, error detection, and executive control functions (e.g., Carter et al. 1999; Duncan and Owen 2000; Barch et al. 2001; van Veen and Carter 2002; Owen et al. 2005).”
- Mindfulness training and the cultivation of secure, satisfying couple relationships. (2013, positive): “Brain structures known to mediate experience sharing include the insula, ACC, superior temporal sulcus, inferior parietal lobule, and the premotor cortex (Zaki & Ochsner, 2012).”
- Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. (2004, background): “Although this possibility cannot be ruled out, it is important to note that several studies have provided evidence for ACC activation in the setting of conflict at other levels of processing, including stimulus evaluation [15,41, 46 ] and task representation [20], pointing to a broader monitoring fu”
- How Does Mindfulness Meditation Work? Proposing Mechanisms of Action From a Conceptual and Neural Perspective (2011, positive): “During meditation, when distracting external events or memories conflict with task goals, ACC activation may contribute to the maintenance of attention by alerting the systems implementing top-down regulation to resolve this conflict (van Veen & Carter, 2002).”
- Inconsistencies in spontaneous and intentional trait inferences. (2012, background): “Convergent neuroscientific evidence suggests that the pmFC and lateral PFC are involved in conflict monitoring and resolution (Van Veen and Carter, 2002, 2006; Botvinick et al., 2004; Kerns et al., 2004; Carter and Van Veen, 2007).”
- Progressive increase of frontostriatal brain activation from childhood to adulthood during event‐related tasks of cognitive control (2006, background): “…Luks and Simpson, 2004; Rubia et al., 1998, 2000], error detection [Ullsperger and van Cramon, 2004a,b; Rubia et al., 2003], and performance monitoring/conflict detection [Botvinick et al., 1999; Carter et al., 1999, 2000; van Veen and Carter, 2002], functions that were demanded by all three tasks.”
- Using EEG to Predict Consumers’ Future Choices (2015, background): “…the same button [no-go]), have demonstrated that the frontocentral N200 generates a larger (more negative) deflection after the presentation of a no-go signal than the presentation of a go signal (Enriquez-Geppert et al. 2010; Falkenstein, Hoormann, and Hohnsbein 1999; Van Veen and Carter 2002).”
- Mapping the functional connectivity of anterior cingulate cortex (2007, background): “On the other hand, the segregation of ACC into affective and cognitive subdivisions has been largely supported by fMRI studies demonstrating the presence of rostral and caudal distinctions, respectively (Bush et al., 2000; Haas et al., 2006; Kiehl et al., 2000; Milham and Banich, 2005; Van Veen and ”
- Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. (2013, background): “…on these N200s can be subsumed under the conflict monitoring hypothesis: relevant fronto-medial negativities arise from a midcingulate generator monitoring the concurrent and competing coactivation of response (or stimulus) representations (Botvinick et al., 2004; van Veen and Carter, 2002).”
- Behavioural Brain Research (2016, neutral): “Testing began shortly after completion of Experiment 1.”
- Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability (2005, background): “Cramon, 2001; van Veen and Carter, 2002 ) suggest that the anterior cingulate cortex plays an important role in regulating behavior through the online monitoring of task performance.”
- Mental fatigue, motivation and action monitoring. (2006, background): “These findings are corroborated with results from fMRI studies (Carter et al., 1998; Kiehl et al., 2000; Van Veen and Carter, 2002a).”