Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology.

By Keith A. Crandall, Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds, Georgina M. Mace, R. Wayne. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2000

1,913 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a0119e93933302491fddeec5fd91f04f1f782f4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

HOW CLOSELY CORRELATED ARE MOLECULAR AND QUANTITATIVE MEASURES OF GENETIC VARIATION? A META‐ANALYSIS (2001, background): “None of these tests yielded significant effects.”
Identifying spatial components of ecological and evolutionary processes for regional conservation planning in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa (2003, background): “Because the ESU focuses on historical isolation rather than adaptive diversity, recent work has suggested that adaptive features maintaining the context of selection should rather be conserved (Crandall et al., 2000; Desmet et al., 2002).”
The Impact of Species Concept on Biodiversity Studies (2004, background): “Furthermore, even if higher taxa are the focus of conservation, management plans must still consider species boundaries and whether groups of individuals are genetically and ecologically distinct ( Crandall et al. 2000 ).”
Quantitative criteria for species delimitation (2010, background): “…are common features of biological systems because hybridization may continue long after speciation, and the sorting of ancestral polymorphisms may continue long after hybridization has ceased (Crandall et al. 2000, Edwards et al. 2005, Rosenberg 2007, Carling & Brumfield 2008, Wang et al. 2008).”
Management of salmonid fisheries in the British Isles: towards a practical approach based on population genetics (2003, background): “From a fisheries management perspective, therefore, the most relevant appreciation of the likely scope for conservation can be gained by using a composite of knowledge (Crandall et al., 2000).”
A survey of equid mitochondrial DNA: Implications for the evolution, genetic diversity and conservation of Equus (2000, positive): “The latest proposal for evolutionarily significant populations suggests that more emphasis should be placed on including ecological (morphological, behavioural, habitat) information as well as genetic information (Crandall et al. 2000).”
Evolutionary Conservation Biology (2004, background): “The two taxa, however, are neither genetically nor ecologically “exchangeable”, in the sense of Crandall et al. (2000), which implies that they are genetically isolated and adapted to different ecological conditions.”
Riverine and marine ecotypes of Sotalia dolphins are different species (2005, background): “To achieve this, and to design effective management policies, it is imperative that evolutionary significant units be distinguished (Dizon et al. 1992, 1997; O’Brien 1994; Avise 1997; Crandall et al. 2000).”
Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis and the Identification of Operational Units for Conservation in Continuous Populations (2002, background): “Also, the analyses can be simultaneously applied to phenotypic adaptive traits and molecular markers, and in this case an even more general concept of conservation units would be adopted (Crandall et al. 2000).”
Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. (2002, background): “Many conservation policies have focused on species in the traditional ‘biological’ sense: groups that do not hybridize (O’Brien & Mayr 1991; Brownlow 1996; Crandall et al. 2000).”
Evolution of the mane and group-living in the lion ( Panthera leo ): a review (2004, neutral): “uk (Crandall et al., 2000; Réale et al., 2003).”
The gap between the concept and definitions in the Evolutionarily Significant Unit: the need to integrate neutral genetic variation and adaptive variation (2007, methodology): “Ryder (1986) 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 3 Waples (1991) 21 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 23 Moritz (1994a, b) 21 1 7 5 16 22 8 8 87 Vogler and DeSalle (1994) 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 6 Crandall et al. (2000) 0 0 1 0 1 3 1 1 7 Fraser and Bernatchez (2001) 0 0 1 0 3 3 0 0 7 Combination 7 0 1 1 5 7 2 1 25 Situational 10 0 0 3 0 13 1 3 30”
Rapid evolutionary dynamics and disease threats to biodiversity (2003, background): “Further studies focusing on those classes of hosts at greatest risk of extinction and those parasites most likely to cause dramatic host declines are needed greatly, as are studies that address the effects of spatial structure and metapopulation processes on disease spread and host evolution (Box 4)”