Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation.

By Michele Drès, James Mallet. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2002

930 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/093ba7add20ae9acfe0b9a5bfdfc50ba64f9dc9b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

Citations in the corpus

Host shifts favor vibrational signal divergence in Enchenopa binotata treehoppers (2008, background): “However, these reproductive barriers may not completely eliminate interactions between host-associated populations (Drès and Mallet 2002).”
A predicted sex pheromone receptor of codling moth Cydia pomonella detects the plant volatile pear ester (2014, background): “…adult food sites, adequate oviposition sites and larval host plants (Bruce and Pickett, 2011) and accordingly play a prominent role in premating reproductive isolation and phylogenetic diversification of insect herbivores (Dres and Mallet, 2002; Smadja and Butlin, 2009; Matsubayashi et al., 2010).”
Multilocus Genetic Analysis of Host Use, Introgression, and Speciation in Host Strains of Fall Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (2004, background): “Second, the two strains are very closely related genetically and seem to be in the early stages of speciation (Prowell 1998, Dres and Mallet 2002 ).”
REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION CAUSED BY NATURAL SELECTION AGAINST IMMIGRANTS FROM DIVERGENT HABITATS (2005, methodology): “…has specifically focused on demonstrating the consequences of ecological population divergence for mating time (temporal isolation) and place (habitat isolation) and for hybrid inviability (Arnold 1997; Schluter 2000; Berlocher and Feder 2002; Drès and Mallet 2002; Funk et al. 2002; Rundle 2002).”
Ecological explanations for (incomplete) speciation. (2009, neutral): “... isolation [2,4–6,9,10,13–16], the degree of genotypic clustering [18,19], the sharpness of geographic clines in gene frequencies [21] and the extent of lineage sorting [22,23] (Figure 1; Table 1). These different means of quantifying divergence can be used to measure arbitrary ‘stages’ of specia”
Butterfly host plant range: an example of plasticity as a promoter of speciation? (2007, background): “Thus, such trait divergence in subpopulations feeding on alternative hosts could facilitate speciation in sympatry or allopatry (see also below, Janz and Nylin 2007 and e.g. Dres and Mallet 2002; Nosil 2007).”
Ecological speciation in phytophagous insects (2010, background): “…evolutionary divergence could yield insight into this question, thereby yielding a comprehensive understanding of how speciation unfolds, from beginning to end (Funk, 1998; Drés & Mallet, 2002; Funk et al., 2002; Funk & Nosil, 2007; Mallet et al., 2007; Nosil et al., 2009b; Peccoud et al., 2009).”
The roles and interactions of reproductive isolation mechanisms in fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) host strains (2010, background): “Important insights in speciation are likely provided by examining contemporary patterns of reproductive isolation among partially isolated populations (e.g. Berlocher & Feder, 2002; Drès & Mallet, 2002; Via, 2002; Via & West, 2008).”
Host shifts and signal divergence: mating signals covary with host use in a complex of specialized plant‐feeding insects (2009, background): “The latter were considered to be ‘host races’; if these represent an intermediate stage of speciation, as was suggested by Dres & Mallet (2003), then the evolution of behavioural isolation may often be important during speciation in phytophagous insects.”
Ecotypes and the controversy over stages in the formation of new species (2012, background): “…(Schluter, 1996, 2009; Rundle et al., 2000; Lexer & Fay, 2005; Rundle & Nosil, 2005; Smadja & Butlin, 2011) and the widespread identification of partially reproductively isolated ecotypes and host races within species (Schluter, 2001; Dres & Mallet, 2002; Rundle & Nosil, 2005; Egan & Funk, 2009).”
Cryptic species within the wheat curl mite Aceria tosichella (Keifer) (Acari : Eriophyoidea), revealed by mitochondrial, nuclear and morphometric data (2012, background): “…revealed that presumed polyphagous taxa are, in fact, complexes of cryptic species that are specialised to different hosts (e.g. Drés and Mallet 2002; Hebert et al. 2003; Blair et al. 2005; Stireman et al. 2005; Smith et al. 2006; Rach et al. 2008; Skoracka and Dabert 2010).”
The generalism-specialism debate: the role of generalists in the life and death of species (2011, background): “Temporal isolation resulting from asynchrony between daughter populations on the parental resource can trigger sympatric/ parapatric evolution (Drès & Mallet, 2002; Fitzpatrick, Fordyce & Gavrilets, 2008).”