Identifying spatial components of ecological and evolutionary processes for regional conservation planning in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa

By Mathieu Rouget, Richard M. Cowling, R. Pressey, D. Richardson. 2003

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4920e0d36ae84d45ee8179dd494730ae41c97577

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Robert J. Whittaker
2. Miguel B. Araújo
3. K. Willis
4. N. Burgess
5. Richard J. Ladle
6. James E. M. Watson
7. P. Jepson
8. R. Pressey

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Miguel B. Araújo
2. Robert J. Whittaker
3. K. Willis
4. Wilfried Thuiller
5. Andrew Lowe
6. J. Scoble
7. James E. M. Watson
8. Richard J. Ladle

Citations in the corpus

• Rarest of the rare: advances in combining evolutionary distinctiveness and scarcity to inform conservation at biogeographical scales (2010, background): “Advances in our knowledge of species distributions and threats have allowed biologists to make detailed recommendations about areas with rare and threatened species (Cowling et al., 2003; Rouget et al., 2003).”
• Biological Invasions in Conservation Planning: A Global Systematic Review (2018, unknown): “…or terrestrial environments can be transferred to the marine environment as well, i.e., exclusion of highly impacted areas (Cowling et al., 2003; Rouget et al., 2003; Pierce et al., 2005; Olson et al., 2010; Reid et al., 2012; Sealey et al., 2014), maximizing contribution to measures of…”
• Factoring species, non-species values and threats into biodiversity prioritisation across the ecoregions of Africa and its islands (2006, background): “It also differs from approaches that seek to utilise specialist software that are able to integrate a wide range of biological and non-biological values, such as C-Plan that has been utilised for conservation planning in Australia and South Africa (Cowling et al., 2003).”
• Conservation Planning and Biodiversity: Assembling the Best Data for the Job (2004, background): “Examples are soil interfaces (Rouget et al. 2003), areas of climatic stability (Fjeldså et al. 1999), drought refugia, migration staging areas, and dispersal barriers. mCriteria include size and connectivity of reserves (Noss et al. 1997).”
• Network analysis in conservation biogeography: challenges and opportunities (2010, background): “, 2009), conservation planning (Rouget et al., 2003) and the conservation of metapopulations of threatened species (e.”
• Conservation Biogeography: assessment and prospect (2005, background): “Recently, attempts have been made within these grid-cell based ‘complementarity’ analyses to combine compositionalist and functionalist criteria based on assessments of the likelihood of persistence of populations in occupied grid cells into the future (e.g. Cowling et al., 1999; Araújo et al., 2002”
• A case for incorporating phylogeography and landscape genetics into species distribution modelling approaches to improve climate adaptation and conservation planning (2010, background): “, 2008), species interactions (Araujo & Luoto, 2007) and a consideration of evolutionary history (Rouget et al., 2003; Byrne, 2008; Byrne et al., 2008).”