The use of culturally-based variables in assessment: Studies on loss of face.

By N. Zane, M. Yeh. 2002

261 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/895b4f2744589764db7bdbca62cc16c46cc4328b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Ronnel B. King
2. D. McInerney
3. J. Rounds
4. Daniel J. Bauer

In Clinical Psychology

1. Ronnel B. King
2. Andreas G. Klein
3. D. McInerney
4. Hsin-ya Liao
5. J. Rounds

In Social Psychology

1. Ronnel B. King
2. D. McInerney
3. Andreas G. Klein
4. Hsin-ya Liao
5. J. Rounds
6. M. Dowson
7. D. Watkins
8. Jesus Alfonso D. Datu

Citations in the corpus

• Culture's Consequences on Student Motivation: Capturing Cross-Cultural Universality and Variability Through Personal Investment Theory (2014, background): “Despite the constructs of face and filial piety being found to be widely applicable (e.g., Ho, 1976; Zane & Yeh, 2002), they are clearly less central notions in the Western psyche.”
• A test of Cramer's (1999) help-seeking model and acculturation effects with Asian and Asian American college students (2005, background): “Zane and Yeh (2002) recommended that counselors conduct “face work” to build rapport before using traditional techniques to elicit self-disclosure, such as the facilitation of emotional arousal and active questioning.”