Book Notice

By Antonis Botinis. Phonetica: International Journal of Phonetic Science, 2016

431 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Prosody in context: a review (2015, background): “In related work on Dutch, Swerts, Bouwhuis, and Collier (1994) present results from a perception study showing that the register, range and shape of the pitch contour at the end of an utterance convey the degree of finality, e.g., expressing the end of a discourse unit.”
The prosodic hierarchy of Swedish (2015, methodology): “…previous research, these two intonational categories have been referred to as SENTENCE ACCENT or FOCAL ACCENT and WORD ACCENT or just ACCENT (e.g. Bruce 1977, 1998, 2005, 2007; Heldner 2001; Hansson 2003; Ambrazaitis 2009; Roll, Horne & Lindgren 2010; Myrberg 2013a; Myrberg & Riad, forthcoming).”
Second Language Comprehensibility Revisited: Investigating the Effects of Learner Background (2015, background): “…Wilson & Wilson, 2001) as well as prosody, particularly in terms of rhythm, thus allowing for direct comparisons between speakers of syllable-timed French (Trofimovich & Isaacs, 2012), non-Romance syllabletimed Hindi (Shackle, 2001), stress-timed Farsi (Jun, 2005), and tonal Chinese (Jun, 2005).”