The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships

By M. Anderson, Emily A. Ronning, R. Vries, B. Martinson. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2007

354 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Pharmacology, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8903e2426aeac142c4a84f4397bffb262f3d869d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Pharmacology

1. Hendrik P. van Dalen
2. Kene Henkens
3. Daniele Fanelli
4. P. Newton
5. John P. A. Ioannidis
6. C. Begley

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Daniele Fanelli

In Statistics and Probability

1. Hendrik P. van Dalen
2. Kene Henkens
3. Daniele Fanelli
4. Matthew C. Makel
5. Jonathan Plucker
6. Brian A. Nosek
7. Marcus Munafò
8. Daniël Lakens

Citations in the corpus

• Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A worldwide survey (2012, background): “The advent of this publish-or-perish culture has been discussed and criticized by scholars in various disciplines (e.g., Anderson, Ronning, De Vries & Martinson, 2007; Adler & Harzing, 2009; Bornmann 2011; Fanelli, 2011; Feller, 2002; Frey & Eichenberger, 1997, Frey, 2010).”
• Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010, background): “Academic competition might be particularly high in US universities [1], but is surely not unique to them.”