Comparing Open and Sealed Bid Auctions: Theory and Evidence from Timber Auctions

By Jonathan D. Levin, Susan Athey, Enrique Seira. 2004

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88e1e460f7622cef672cb42618b0f9fc55d142bb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Marion
2. E. Guerre
3. Q. Vuong
4. I. Perrigne
5. Patrick Bajari
6. S. Houghton
7. S. Tadelis
8. Jingfeng Lu

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. J. Marion
2. I. Perrigne
3. Q. Vuong
4. S. Houghton
5. S. Tadelis
6. Patrick Bajari
7. E. Guerre
8. Jingfeng Lu

In Marketing

1. J. Marion
2. I. Perrigne
3. Q. Vuong
4. S. Tadelis
5. S. Houghton
6. E. Guerre
7. Patrick Bajari
8. Elena Krasnokutskaya

Citations in the corpus

• Estimating risk aversion from ascending and sealed-bid auctions: the case of timber auction data (2008, result): “It is interesting to make the parallel with the results obtained by Athey et al. (2004), who use ascending and sealed-bid sales in two forests in Idaho, Montana and California over 1982-1990.”
• Bidding for Incomplete Contracts: An Empirical Analysis (2006, background): “See for instance, Paarsch (1992), Donald and Paarsch (1993), Guerre, Perrigne and Vuong (2000), Campo et al. (2002), Pesendorfer and Jofre-Bonet (2003), and Athey, Levin and Seira (2004).”
• Are bid preferences benign? The effect of small business subsidies in highway procurement auctions (2007, background): “First, the equation (1) will be estimated with and without including the number of bidders in the vector Xk.”