Change in Gender-Ideology, 1977-1996: The Contributions of Intracohort Change and Population Turnover
By Karin L. Brewster, Irene Padavic. 2000
479 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8835100675403314c8e03657e90b667ec3e68451
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- David J. Maume
- Melissa A. Milkie
- C. Knoester
- S. Bianchi
- E. Geisler
- G. Pendell
- John P. Robinson
- Tanya Koropeckyj‐Cox
In Sociology and Political Science
- David J. Maume
- Melissa A. Milkie
- C. Knoester
- S. Bianchi
- E. Geisler
- G. Pendell
- John P. Robinson
- Tanya Koropeckyj‐Cox
Citations in the corpus
- Gendered Division of Childrearing: Ideals, Realities, and the Relationship to Parental Well-Being (2002, background): “Ideals about men’s and women’s proper roles in paid work and family life have shifted over the past half century toward more genderneutral, egalitarian views alongside the massive movement of women, especially mothers, into the paid labor force ( Brewster & Padavic, 2000; Spain &”
- Gender ideology construction from adolescence to young adulthood (2007, background): “Trend and panel studies have shown that increased education is associated with increased gender egalitarianism (Bolzendahl and Myers, 2004; Brooks and Bolzendahl, 2004; Brewster and Padavic, 2000; Cunningham et al., 2005; Fan and Marini, 2000; Tallichet and Willits, 1986).”
- Population Aging, Intracohort Aging, and Sociopolitical Attitudes (2007, background): “Nevertheless, analyses on the volatility of occupational aspirations by gender (Jacobs 1989) and of gender ideology (Bolzendahl and Myers 2004; Brewster and Padavic 2000) suggest potential period effects during the course of the time period we examine in this article.”
- If You’re So Smart, Why Aren’t You the Boss? Explaining the Persistent Vertical Gender Gap in Management (2011, background): “…65 percent in 1977 (Spitze and Huber 1980).4 Analysis of related GSS questions between 1977 and 1996 revealed that both cohort succession and within-cohort attitude shifts led to increasingly positive attitudes about women, including mothers, working (Mason and Lu 1988; Brewster and Padavic 2000).”
- Attitudes About Childlessness in the United States (2007, background): “Studies of attitudes among successive cohorts have shown less traditional attitudes among younger cohorts, reflecting the social changes that have been a major part of their younger adult years (see Brewster & Padavic, 2000; Thornton, Alwin, & Camburn, 1983).”
- “Unpackaging” Acculturation (2002, methodology): “Second-generation women (born in the United States) were better educated and had less traditional attitudes than first-generation women.”
- Family Structure and the Intergenerational Transmission of Gender Ideology (2011, background): “…cohorts and generations are more egalitarian than older cohorts and generations, there have also been substantial withincohort changes toward egalitarianism (Brewster & Padavic, 2000; Brooks & Bolzendahl, 2004; Ciabattari, 2001; Fan & Marini, 2000; Moen et al., 1997; Thornton &Young-Demarco, 2001).”
- Gender Role Attitudes and Careers: A Longitudinal Study (2007, methodology): “When Brewster and Padavic (2000) studied changes in gender ideology from 1977 through 1996, they found that individual attitudes and cohort succession contributed equally to the liberalization of gender role attitudes.”