ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGY, INDIVIDUAL PERSONALITY AND INNOVATION BEHAVIOR

By B. Åmo, Lars Kolvereid. 2005

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87fcc1a9c76e14eda9343b250182a9ead427e640

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

1. W. Kirkley
2. C. Blanka
3. J. Ruiz-Navarro
4. C. Camelo‐Ordaz
5. Y. Wu
6. Shihping Kevin Huang
7. Y. Wang
8. Holger Patzelt

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Erik W. Monsen
2. Todd Saxton
3. W. Kirkley
4. C. Blanka
5. J. Ruiz-Navarro
6. C. Camelo‐Ordaz
7. Y. Wu
8. Shihping Kevin Huang

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. W. Kirkley
2. C. Blanka
3. J. Ruiz-Navarro
4. C. Camelo‐Ordaz
5. Y. Wu
6. Shihping Kevin Huang
7. Y. Wang
8. Holger Patzelt

Citations in the corpus

• Entrepreneurial behaviour: the role of values (2016, background): “Entrepreneurial behaviour is, however, intentional, deliberate, self-determined and occurs in circumstances characterised by uncertainty and risk (Naffziger et al., 1994; Ajzen and Fishbein, 2000; Amo and Kolvereid, 2005).”
• Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: an empirical study of R&D personnel (2013, methodology): “Most prior entrepreneurship research has predominantly adopted the firm as the unit of innovation performance analysis and has overly focused on firm-level innovation performance (A ˚ mo and Kolvereid, 2005).”
• Beyond Simple Utility: Incentive Design and Trade–Offs for Corporate Employee–Entrepreneurs (2010, background): “…research has shown that, for example, entrepreneurial goals and motivations (Kuratko, Hornsby, & Naffziger, 1997; Shane et al., 2003), personality (Åmo & Kolvereid, 2005; Becherer & Maurer, 1999), perceptions of risk and uncertainty (Sauner-Leroy, 2004), and rank within the organization (Hornsby…”
• The intrapreneur and innovation in creative firms (2012, background): “It is argued that while intrapreneurship is rooted in entrepreneurship (Amo and Kolvereid, 2005; Molina and Callahan, 2009), there are several differences between the two concepts.”
• Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and innovation in small and medium enterprises (2011, background): “Åmo and Kolvereid (2005) have defined innovative behavior as “an initiative from employees concerning the introduction of new processes, new products, new markets or combinations of such into the organization” (p.”
• Perceptions of Adverse Work Conditions and Innovative Behavior: The Buffering Roles of Relational Resources (2016, unknown): “…within the organization (e.g., Block & MacMillan, 1993; Parker, 2011; Zajac, Golden, & Shorten, 1991) or to other forms of organizational renewal (Amo & Kolvereid, 2005; Corbett, Covin, O’Connor, & Tucci, 2013; Shepherd, Haynie, & Patzelt, 2013), the innovative behaviors by a firm’s rank-andfile…”
• An individual-level perspective on intrapreneurship: a review and ways forward (2019, background): “Based on the assumption that individual-level initiatives, as well as organizationallevel approaches such as CE, are necessary to enable intrapreneurial behaviour (Åmo and Kolvereid 2005), a second stream of research offers an organizationallevel lens on intrapreneurship.”