Strategic Management of Intangible Assets and Value Drivers in R&D Organizations
By S. Pike, Goran Roos, Bernard Marr. 2005
194 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87f531867fc71822761ca597ac362c8b1eae1a88
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
- Miriam Delgado-Verde
- José Emilio Navas-López
- Shun-Pin Chuang
- Josep Llach
- Vinod Kumar
- Sun-Jen Huang
- Dong-Young Kim
- Gregorio Martin de Castro
Citations in the corpus
- The Effect of Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility on Environmental Performance and Business Competitiveness: The Mediation of Green Information Technology Capital (2016, result): “These perspectives are also consistent with the resource-based theory, which regards IT as a critical resource that is associated with competitive advantage (Powell and Dent-Micallef 1997; Bharadwaj 2000; Melville et al. 2004; Pike et al. 2005).”
- Social capital and innovation in R&D teams: the mediating roles of psychological safety and learning from mistakes (2013, unknown): “Furthermore, it has been noted that, as core activities, R&D is often a starting point of innovation in organizations (Pike et al., 2005).”
- Organizational knowledge assets and innovation capability (2011, background): “): human capital, organizational or structural capital, and relational capital, which represent the most commonly, accepted categories of intangibles ( Pike et al. , 2005”
- From customer value to repurchase intentions and recommendations (2008, background): “…university-industry alliances (Plewa and Quester, 2006), divisions within innovative private organizations (Gupta and Wilemon, 1996; Pike, Roos and Marr, 2005; Hirons et al., 1998), government departments (Garrett-Jones et al., 2005) and semiprivatized government organizations (Pike et al., 2005).”
- A FRAMEWORK FOR PRIORITIZATION OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL INDICATORS IN R&D (2009, methodology): “To increase the reliability of results, the framework employs two methodologies – the Delphi approach and AHP – that have been widely proven as among the best tools to weigh indicators ( Pike et al. , 2005a, b”
- Innovation in family and non-family businesses: a resource perspective (2010, background): “Therefore, in firms where R&D is a core asset, human capital is important because of their reliance on highly educated scientists and technicians with know-how in relevant areas (Pike et al., 2005).”
- Value creation in the quadruple helix: a micro level conceptual model of principal investigators as value creators (2018, unknown): “Pike et al. (2005) categorise the resource categories that underpin value drivers for R&D as human, organisational, relational, physical and monetary capital.”