COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses

By Joseph Crawford, K. Butler-Henderson, J. Rudolph, B. Malkawi, M. Glowatz, R. Burton, P. Magni, Sin Manw Sophia Lam. 1, 2020

1,742 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created significant challenges for the global higher education community. Through a desktop analysis leveraging university and government sources where possible, we provide a timely map of the intra-period higher education responses to COVID-19 across 20 countries. We found that the responses by higher education providers have been diverse from having no response through to social isolation strategies on campus and rapid curriculum redevelopment for fully online offerings. We provide in our discussion a typology of the types of responses currently undertaken and assess the agility of higher education in preparing for the pandemic. We believe there are significant opportunities to learn from the pedagogical developments of other universities, in order to strengthen our collective response to COVID-19 now and into the future.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87761cfa527227abe00aa2b91672339ff048eda3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

  1. İbrahim Doyumğaç
  2. Kasım Karataş
  3. Mustafa Said Kıymaz
  4. Yun Li
  5. Anise M. S. Wu
  6. Ibrahim Arpaci
  7. Kwok-Kit Tong
  8. Juliet Honglei Chen

In Information Systems

  1. Edmond Kwesi Agormedah
  2. İbrahim Doyumğaç
  3. Enoch Apori Ansah
  4. Kasım Karataş
  5. D. M. K. Ayite
  6. Mustafa Said Kıymaz
  7. Eugene Adu Henaku
  8. Ibrahim Arpaci

Citations in the corpus