Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry.

By J. Rudolph, R. Simon, Peter E. Rivard, Ronald L. Dufresne, D. Raemer. Anesthesiology Clinics, 2007

755 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/871d5c861aedb7d9669e2b09dd4cce5aebe39633

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. K. Dreifuerst
2. Debra A. Scrandis
3. Amy Daniels
4. C. Haut
5. Mary K. Fey

Citations in the corpus

• Getting Started With Debriefing for Meaningful Learning (2015, background): “Many debriefing strategies use what went right, what went wrong, and what would you do differently as the primary cues for discussion, a tradition that goes back to military and airline debriefing (Fanning and Gaba, 2007, Rudolph et al., 2007).”
• Learning Through Debriefing: Students' Perspectives (2014, background): “Consistent findings on facilitator and process characteristics include having a structure, positive faculty demeanor, debriefing immediately after the simulation, providing honest and forthright feedback on performance, provision of a safe learning environment, and having enough time to adequately d”