Entrepreneur behaviors, opportunity recognition, and the origins of innovative ventures

By Jeffrey H. Dyer, H. Gregersen, Clayton M. Christensen. 2008

451 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Safety Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/860fa5c17eedf95d078740bcfcd85319947a1d94

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Safety Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The role of problem solving ability on innovative behavior and opportunity recognition in university students (2018, background): “Many studies have also demonstrated the difference in behavior that successful entrepreneurs see as contributing to their ability to recognize opportunities and create innovative business ideas (Dyer et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2017).”
The Concept of “Opportunity” in Entrepreneurship Research: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges (2010, background): “Most recently, using network theory, Dyer et al. (2008) found that one’s ability to generate novel ideas for innovative new businesses is a function of questioning, observing, experimenting, and idea networking behaviors.”
Turning Agents into Psychological Principals: Aligning Interests of Non‐Owners Through Psychological Ownership (2013, unknown): “[1] We also considered the Pearce et al. (1997) and the Dyer et al. (2008) scales for entrepreneurial and innovative behaviour as measurement instruments.”
A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors (2014, background): “information and identify opportunities differs (Dyer et al. 2008).”
Students' Entrepreneurial Intentions: The Role of Prior Learning Experiences and Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Competencies* (2018, background): “…entrepreneurs to understand contextual dynamics and develop practical and sustainable solutions to start their venture, whereas the latter is the cognitive skill that Dyer, Gregersen, and Christensen (2008) describe as associational thinking and which favors the generation of new business ideas.”
Are You Experienced or Are You Talented?: When Does Innate Talent versus Experience Explain Entrepreneurial Performance? (2012, background): “Finally, they are more likely to engage in frame-breaking activities such as experimentation, questioning and observation that are associated with divergent thinking (Dyer et al, 2008).”
The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship (2017, unknown): “…fundamental question within entrepreneurship research is the distinction between imitative and innovative entrepreneurs and identification of the distinguishing characteristics of innovative entrepreneurs (Cliff, Jennings, and Greenwood 2006; Dyer, Gregersen, and Christensen 2008; Koellinger 2008).”