MATCHTM: a tool for searching transcription factor binding sites in DNA sequences
By A. Kel, E. Gößling, I. Reuter, E. Cheremushkin, O. Kel-Margoulis, E. Wingender. Nucleic Acids Res., 2003
1,207 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85ba93fc666168c29b8102396a31cd504cc31c3b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Molecular Biology
- Gabriela G. Loots
- Ivan Ovcharenko
- Wei Shi
- Gordon K. Smyth
- Inna Dubchak
- Jaak Vilo
- Lior S. Pachter
- Edward M. Rubin
Citations in the corpus
- VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics (2004, methodology): “rVISTA makes predictions based on using the MatchTM program ( 33 )”
- High-Resolution Temporal Profiling of Transcripts during Arabidopsis Leaf Senescence Reveals a Distinct Chronology of Processes and Regulation[C][W][OA] (2011, methodology): “For any given PSSM and promoter, we scanned the sequence and computed a matrix similarity score (Kel et al., 2003) at each position on both strands.”
- The TRANSFAC project as an example of framework technology that supports the analysis of genomic regulation (2008, neutral): “Sets of binding sites can be summarized into an International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) consensus, which can be used for the prediction of TFBSs (PatSearch/Patch [16] [19]), or a simple statistical model such as a weight matrix can be derived and used for this purpose (MatInspector”
- The transcription factors Blimp-1 and IRF4 jointly control the differentiation and function of effector regulatory T cells (2011, methodology): “Searches for putative Blimp-1- and IRF4-binding sites in the Il10 locus were made with the MATCH program in the TRANSFAC databas”
- rVISTA 2.0: evolutionary analysis of transcription factor binding sites (2004, methodology): “Comparative detection of PWMs in long genomic intervals performed by MATCH (6) and tfSearch programs Region/PWMs MATCH(s) (cut-off = 0.75) tfSearch(s) (cut-off = 0.75) Speed increase MATCH(s) (cut-off = 0.85) tfSearch(s) (cut-off = 0.85) Speed increase 1 Mb/491 PWMs 12243.0 708.4 17· 4029.5 54.6 74·”
- An enhanced computational platform for investigating the roles of regulatory RNA and for identifying functional RNA motifs (2013, methodology): “MATCH [25] is an approach for searching transcription factor binding sites with specific position-weight matrices (PWM).”
- MatInspector and beyond: promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites (2005, methodology): “The program Match (Kel et al. (2003)) uses a similar scoring scheme as MatInspector, but lacks matrix families (see below), resulting in a large number of redundant matches.”
- TRANSFAC®: transcriptional regulation, from patterns to profiles (2003, background): “MATCHTM: ENHANCEMENT BY TISSUE- AND STATE-SPECIFIC PROFILES TRANSFAC1 6.0 is accompanied by the new public version of MatchTM ( 12 ).”
- Transcriptional regulatory elements in the human genome. (2006, neutral): “Programs such as MatInspector (150) and, more recently, MATCH (88) compare a genomic sequence input to all the matrices in TRANSFAC, and return a list of potential TFBSs based on a statistical match between a region in the sequence and a site matrix.”
- The functional landscape of the human phosphoproteome (2019, methodology): “A matrix similarity score (MSS) ranging from 0 to 1 was next computed between the PWMs and each Serine, Threonine, and Tyrosine in the human proteome as described in the MATCH algorithm (Kel et al. 2003).”
- g:Profiler—a web-based toolset for functional profiling of gene lists from large-scale experiments (2007, methodology): “First, TFBS are found by matching TRANSFAC position-specific matrices using the program Match (20) on 1000-bp upstream regions, as provided by the UCSC genome database (21).”
- SNPinfo: integrating GWAS and candidate gene information into functional SNP selection for genetic association studies (2009, methodology): “Possible scores for MSS and CSS range from 0 to 1 ( 10 ).”