Description and explanation of pragmatic development: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research
By Naoko Taguchi. System (Linköping), 2018
137 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Developmental research in L2 pragmatics addresses two essential issues: changes within the L2 pragmatics systems and influences on the systems (Bardovi-Harlig, 1999). These two issues can be best examined through the lens of longitudinal research, which by design allows us to observe how L2 learners change over time and helps establish causal relationships between change and time. Although the body of longitudinal studies describing changes has expanded in the past decade, not many studies have documented influences on the changing pragmatic systems. Existing studies are largely descriptive rather than explanatory, and do not explain how and why changes occurred. To address this limitation, this paper presents mixed methods research as a promising approach. By integrating quantitative and qualitative data analyses in a single study, mixed methods research can reveal patterns of change over time, and at the same time help reveal individual and contextual factors influencing the observed patterns. Using example studies, this paper illustrates how mixed methods approaches can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of pragmatic development.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/854a90dfdda4583047fbc67edecdb984c653036a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- Roles and research foci of artificial intelligence in language education: an integrated bibliographic analysis and systematic review approach (2021, methodology): “According to Taguchi (2018), the research methods are divided into Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods.”