Mixing Business With Politics: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents and Outcomes of Corporate Political Activity
By Sean Lux, Russell Crook, D. Woehr. 2011
491 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84b885771e3679786bdc66e30616c27e8f0a5869
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Market–political ambidexterity during institutional transitions (2013, unknown): “2 A recent meta-analysis on the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activity (Lux et al., 2011) samples 78 studies, but all of these studies use data from the United States.”
- Political activity and firm performance within nonmarket research: A review and international comparative assessment (2015, unknown): “However, the outcomes of CPA are among the least studied (Lux et al., 2011).”
- Firm lobbying and influence in developing countries: a multilevel approach (2012, background): “Consistent with existing work on corporate lobbying in the United States, multilevel estimates that control for firm-, sector-, and country-level heterogeneity support the hypotheses that lobbying and political influence increase with the firm’s size and market power.”
- Institutional Strategies in Emerging Markets (2015, unknown): “…CPA on public policy (Choi, Jia & Lu, 2014; Campbell, 1998; Dean, Vryza, & Fryxell, 1998; Holburn & Vanden Bergh, 2008; Keim & Zardkoohi, 1988; Lord, 2000; Ramirez & Eigen-Zucchi, 2001) and firm performance (Cook & Fox, 2000; Hiatt & Park, 2013; Lux et al., 2011; Shaffer, Quasney, & Grimm, 2000).”