Norms, expectations, and deception: A norm violation model of veracity judgments

By Timothy R. Levine, Lori N. Anders, John Banas, K. Baum, Keriane Endo, Allison D. S. Hu, N. Wong. 2000

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Appropriate and Inappropriate Uses of Humor by Teachers (2006, background): “When we violate norms, we are likely to be perceived as behaving inappropriately (Levine et al. 2000).”
The Effects of an Auditor's Communication Mode and Professional Tone on Client Responses to Audit Inquiries (2017, background): “…from norms or otherwise expected behavior.6 One of the propositions of EVT 6 In the communications literature, debate exists on whether norm violations and expectancy violations represent separate constructs (see Levine et al. 2000).”
Deception Detection Accuracy is a Predictable Linear Function of Message Veracity Base-Rate: A Formal Test of Park and Levine's Probability Model (2006, background): “…especially pronounced when people interact face-to-face (Buller, Strzyzewski, & Hunsaker, 1991), when people know the message source (McCornack & Parks, 1986), and in studies where the participants are unaware that their task is to detect lies (e.g., Levine et al., 2000; McCornack & Levine, 1990).”
The Dark Side of Emotion in the Classroom: Emotional Processes as Mediators of Teacher Communication Behaviors and Student Negative Emotions (2014, background): “Contrary to this pattern, researchers exploring teacher misbehaviors adopt the perspective that poor communication behaviors violate socially acceptable norms for classroom communication (Levine et al., 2000).”