Towards information security behavioural compliance

By C. Vroom, Rossouw Von Solms. Computers & security, 2004

498 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Encouraging information security behaviors in organizations: Role of penalties, pressures and perceived effectiveness (2009, background): “Although auditing of the employee behavior is suggested, there is very little evidence that it occurs in practice [70].”
Determining employee awareness using the Human Aspects of Information Security Questionnaire (HAIS-Q) (2014, methodology): “….com/locate/cose Determining employee awareness using the Human Aspects of Information Security Questionnaire (HAIS-Q) Kathryn Parsons a,*, Agata McCormac a, Marcus Butavicius a, Malcolm Pattinson b, Cate Jerram b aDefence Science and Technology Organisation (DSTO), 203L, PO Box 1500,…”
Future directions for behavioral information security research (2013, background): “…focused efforts are important, one area that is a predominant weakness in properly securing information assets is the individual user within an organization (Leach, 2003; Posey et al., 2011b; Sasse et al., 2001; Stanton et al., 2005; Vroom and von Solms, 2004; Warkentin and Willison, 2009).”
Information systems security policy compliance: An empirical study of the effects of socialisation, influence, and cognition (2014, background): “Researchers have indicated that organisations that fail to focus on individual and other organisational issues, alongside technology-based solutions, may fail to achieve success in their efforts [30,36,45,51,52].”