What determines patent value?: Insights from the semiconductor industry
By M. Reitzig. 2003
250 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/843668e873ee6d4e434ec761274028bb31028548
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Management of Technology and Innovation
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Patents versus ex post rewards: A new look (2003, unknown): “…patents as efficient devices to appropriate their innovations and, therefore, to secure monopoly rents (Mansfield et al., 1981; Mansfield, 1986; Levin et al., 1987; Goto and Nagata, 1996; Arundel and van de Paal, 1995; Cohen et al., 2000; Arundel, 2001; Hall and Ziedonis, 2001; Reitzig, 2003).”
- The private values of ‘thickets’ and ‘fences’: towards an updated picture of the use of patents across industries (2004, background): “See Reitzig (2002b) for an overview of the relevant literature (Nordhaus, 1967; Teece, 1986; Gilbert and Shapiro, 1990; Klemperer, 1990; Gallini, 1992; Matutes et al., 1996) and Reitzig (2003) for first empirical evidence from the semiconductor industry.”
- Learning from What Others Have Learned from You: The Effects of Knowledge Spillovers on Originating Firms (2010, unknown): “Patents with broader claims provide patent owners with more general protection in the use of their inventions, leading to enhanced patent value (Reitzig, 2003).”