Mirror or Megaphone?: How relationships between narcissism and social networking site use differ on Facebook and Twitter

By Elliot T. Panek, Yioryos Nardis, Sara Konrath. 2013

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83dba84bceb5157048e95a150471b6d96f7a0453

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Emily Grijalva
2. Shawn M. Bergman
3. Jacqueline Z. Bergman
4. Jessica L. McCain
5. Matthew E. Fearrington
6. Shaun W. Davenport
7. K. Badura
8. W. Keith Campbell

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Shawn M. Bergman
2. Jacqueline Z. Bergman
3. Jessica L. McCain
4. Matthew E. Fearrington
5. Shaun W. Davenport
6. K. Badura
7. W. Keith Campbell
8. Steven W. Whiting

Citations in the corpus

• Twitter versus Facebook: Exploring the role of narcissism in the motives and usage of different social media platforms (2014, methodology): “Unlike Facebook, few empirical investigations have been conducted using Twitter (e.g., Chen, 2011; Hughes et al., 2012; McKinney et al., 2012; Panek et al., 2013).”
• Narcissism and Social Media Use: A Meta-Analytic Review (2016, background): “For example, Facebook and Twitter have been found to differ in the facets of narcissism that drive use (Davenport et al., 2014; Panek et al., 2013).”
• Examining the “I” in Team: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Influence of Team Narcissism Composition on Team Outcomes in the NBA (2020, result): “Although the idea that Twitter usage is indicative of narcissism seems face valid, and empirical evidence has established a link between tweeting and narcissism (Davenport et al., 2014;McKinneyet al., 2012; Panek et al., 2013), we conducted an additional study to support the construct validity of ou”