Motivating offenders to change in therapy: an organizing framework

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Reconstructing the Risk-Need-Responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation (2007, unknown): “…on personal striving and goals does support the utility of emphasizing approach goals when seeking to induce behavior change rather than concentrating on reducing, eliminating, or modifying problematic features of offenders (i.e., avoidance goals; Emmons, 1996, 1999; McMurran & Ward, 2004).”
The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Model (2011, background): “But GLM also has been critiqued for weakness in theory and practical implications (McMurran & Ward, 2004; Ward, Polaschek, & Beech, 2006).”
Recovery and desistance: what the emerging recovery movement in the alcohol and drug area can learn from models of desistance from offending (2017, unknown): “Attention is paid to offenders capacities and strengths, ‘encouraging clinicians to think clearly about just what it is that the person is seeking when committing the offence’ (McMurran & Ward 2004, p. 302).”
Motivational interviewing with offenders: A systematic review (2009, background): “Readiness for treatment and change is determined by a multiplicity of internal and external factors ( Ward, Day, Howells, & Birgden, 2004), among which personal goals serve as one way of construing motivation (Karoly, 1993, 1999; McMurran & Ward, 2004; Michalak & Grosse Holtforth, 2006).”