In Search of Program Implementation: 792 Replications of the Teaching-Family Model

By D. Fixsen, Karen A. Blase, G. D. Timbers, M. Wolf. 2007

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Why Is Implementation Science Important for Intervention Design and Evaluation Within Educational Settings? (2018, result): “Fixsen et al. (2001) found in their analysis of implementation that designated teams led to an 80% success rate in implementation over a 3-year period, compared to 14% success over a 17-year period for programmes that did not have such teams.”
Increasing New Teachers’ Specific Praise Using a Within-School Consultation Intervention (2015, background): “Instead, Fixsen, Blasé, Timbers, and Wolf (2001) recommended that a training approach should fit within the existing school culture and involve longitudinal, ongoing support to most appropriately foster meaningful changes in staff behavior (Fixsen et al., 2001).”
Core Implementation Components (2009, background): “Ineffective programs can be implemented well (e.g., the Drug Abuse Resistance Education program, Elliott, 1997; Ennett, Tobler, Ringwalt, & Flewelling, 1994), and effective programs can be implemented poorly (e.g., Fixsen & Blase, 1993; Fixsen et al., 2001).”