Why they stay: women persisting in US engineering careers

By Kathleen Buse, Diana Bilimoria, Sheri Perelli. 2013

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Gender Studies, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/838f71c55b66a67a2b86949990637e2d024322aa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Mercedes C. Santana
2. N. Fouad
3. J. Perry

In Gender Studies

1. Mercedes C. Santana
2. N. Fouad
3. Robert W. Lent
4. Steven D. Brown

In Safety Research

1. Mercedes C. Santana
2. N. Fouad
3. Robert W. Lent
4. Steven D. Brown
5. Lisa Y. Flores
6. J. Perry

Citations in the corpus

• #Trending topics in careers: a review and future research agenda (2017, unknown): “…2015; Raque-Bogdan et al., 2013), and also studies examining the glass ceiling (e.g. Ezzedeen et al., 2015), career choices, and stereotypes among women (e.g. Buse et al., 2013; Deemer et al., 2016), and parenthood in terms of the role of gender (e.g. Kulik and Liberman, 2013; Lewis et al., 2015).”
• SCCT and Underrepresented Populations in STEM Fields (2017, methodology): “Using a strengths-based qualitative approach, Buse, Bilimoria, and Perelli (2013) interviewed 31 engineers (10 who had left the field) from an SCCT lens and focused on early learning experiences, self-efficacy, career identity, outcome expectations, and environmental barriers or supports.”