Management heterogeneity, competitive interaction groups, and firm performance

By C. Carl Pegels, Yongtao Song, Bai-Chuan Yang. 2000

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Why do top management teams look the way they do? A multilevel exploration of the antecedents of TMT heterogeneity (2009, background): “Similarly, Pegels et al. (2000) found that the degree of tenure, educational and functional background diversity in TMTs differs between industry groups.”
Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation (2018, background): “TMT heterogeneity reflects cognitive and information processing capabilities of TMTs (Pegels et al., 2000), and TMT size is a reflection of the team’s capabilities and resources (Haleblian and Finkelstein, 1993; Vyakarnam and Handelberg, 2005).”
Do CFOs Have Style? An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Individual CFOs on Accounting Practices* (2011, background): “The majority of these studies rely on observable manager demographic characteristics (e.g., age, education , functional background, and so on) as proxies for the unobservable cognitive characteristics of top executives (e.g., Zajac and Westphal 1996; Pegels, Song, and Yang 2000; Marcel 2009).”
Knowledge capability, strategic change, and firm performance: The moderating role of the environment (2007, background): “Functional heterogeneity was associated with competitive behavior in a study by Pegels et al. (2000)”