Geographical Spillovers and University Research: A Spatial EconometricPerspective

By Luc Anselin, Attila V. Varga, Zoltan J. Acs. 2000

335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/836fda41ad5313bf323446d8513f3117f4c047a8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity (2011, neutral): “…and dissemination of knowledge are seen as the fundamental characteristics of contemporary competitive dynamics, likewise in fostering innovative activity (Sorenson and Audia 2000; Baum and Sorenson 2003; Varga 2000; Stuart and Shane 2002; Anselin et al. 2000; Santoro and Chakrabarti 2002).”
The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms: evidence from the Italian case (2014, positive): “In 2000, the authors extended their prior work to a sectorally disaggregated level (Anselin et al. 2000a).”
Both Marshall and Jacobs were Right! (2016, background): “…Porter (1990) Easier flow of (tacit) knowledge across individuals through enhanced face-to-face contact Knowledge spillovers Jaffe et al. (1993) Anselin et al. (2000) Anselin et al. (1997) Lower transportation costs + hysteresis New economic geography Krugman (1991) Related variety…”
Density and Creativity in U.S. Regions (2008, background): “This research reflects and clearly builds on early work by Feldman and Florida (1994, 210) that found that “innovation is increasingly dependent on a geographically defined [technological] infrastructure.” Additionally, research by Anselin, Varga, and Acs (2000) found strong evidence of geographic”
Knowledge Spillovers from Research Universities: Evidence from Endowment Value Shocks (2014, neutral): “5 See, for example, Bania, Eberts, and Fogerty (1993), Audretsch and Feldman (1996), Anselin, Varga, and Acs (1997, 2000), Zucker, Darby, and Brewer (1998), Varga (2000), Adams (2002), Cohen, Nelson, and Walsh (2002), Woodward, Figueiredo, and Guimarães (2006), Abramovsky, Harrison, and Simpson…”
University Spillovers: Does the Kind of Science Matter? (2004, background): “…reproduction and dissemination of know-ledge is seen as the fundamental characteristic of contemporary competitive dynamics and in fostering innovative activity (Anselin et al. 2000; Sorensen and Audia 2000; Varga 2000; Santoro and Chakrabarti 2002; Stuart and Shane 2002; Baum and Sorensen 2003).”
An Evaluation of the Accessibility Benefits of Commuter Rail in Eastern Massachusetts using Spatial Hedonic Price Functions (2006, methodology): “... Based on the OLS residuals, Lagrange multiplier tests (see Anselin & Getis 1992) and their robust counterparts (see Anselin et al. 1996) are used in conjunction with several specifications of spatial contiguity as diagnostic tools to test for the two most relevant forms of spatial autocorrelatio”
Universities and Innovation in Space (2007, background): “Anselin et al. (1997, 2000) and Acs et al. (2002) found that in the USA the significant effects of university R&D on innovation output of private sector firms are limited to a distance of about 75 miles.”