Commuter Bicyclist Route Choice: Analysis Using a Stated Preference Survey
By M. Stinson, Chandra R. Bhat. 2003
356 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8312be643880ca1ab0141934cc46dddf1b92f909
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Naveen Eluru
- Chandra R. Bhat
- Jennifer Dill
- K. Krizek
- Ipek N. Sener
- Bert van Wee
- S. Handy
- Ricardo A. Daziano
In Transportation
Citations in the corpus
- An analysis of bicycle route choice preferences in Texas, US (2009, background): “The positive coefficient corresponding to the continuous bicycle facility dummy variable clearly underscores the preference among bicyclists for a continuous bicycle facility, especially for long commute trips (see Stinson and Bhat, 2003, and Antonakos, 1994 for a similar result).”
- Who are Bicyclists? Why and how much are they Bicycling? (2009, background): “Parkin et al. (14), Stinson and Bhat (21), Cervero and Duncan (22), and Sener et al. (23) found the presence of steep hills to be a major deterrent to bicycling, especially for women.”
- A hybrid-choice latent-class model for the analysis of the effects of weather on cycling demand (2015, background): “We first reviewed several survey instruments to identify questions for desired topics, such as travel patterns, environmental factors, and perceptions associated with bicycling (Akar and Clifton, 2009; Stinson and Bhat, 2003).”
- TRAILS, LANES, OR TRAFFIC: VALUING BICYCLE FACILITIES WITH AN ADAPTIVE STATED PREFERENCE SURVEY (2007, methodology): “Stinson and Bhat (2003) using data from a web based stated preference survey estimated a logit model to understand important attributes for commuter cyclist route choice.”
- Two Approaches to Valuing Some of Bicycle Facilities' Presumed Benefits: Propose a session for the 2007 National Planning Conference in the City of Brotherly Love (2006, methodology): “Stinson and Bhat (2003) administered an Internetbased stated-preference survey and used the data to estimate a logit model of how facility attributes affected commuter route choice.”
- Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. (2010, background): “…prefer bike lanes to off-road paths (Akar and Clifton, in press; Antonakos, 1994; Bureau of Transportation Statistics, 2004; Hunt and Abraham, 2007; Stinson and Bhat, 2003; Tilahun et al., 2007) or have little or no preference for striped lanes over no striping (Taylor and Mahmassani, 1996; Sener…”
- Bikeway Networks: A Review of Effects on Cycling (2016, background): “The majority of individual-level studies relied on statistically non-representative samples of avid cyclists, bike commuters, or members of university communities (e.g. Akar & Clifton, 2009; Broach et al., 2012; Stinson & Bhat, 2003; Tilahun et al., 2007).”
- Commuting by Bicycle: An Overview of the Literature (2010, background): “Inexperienced cyclists, women and younger cyclists tend to consider bicycle facilities to be more important (Stinson and Bhat, 2003; Krizek et al., 2004; Stinson and Bhat, 2005; Garrard et al., 2008).”