Technology policy and the regions — the case of the BioRegio contest
By D. Dohse. 2000
223 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82a8be471215e5b15db382bff85fc6f32e3c1179
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Michaela Trippl
- Mike Wright
- Franz Tödtling
- David B. Audretsch
- Donald S. Siegel
- Martin Kenney
- Michael Fritsch
- Maksim Belitski
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Mike Wright
- Donald S. Siegel
- Michaela Trippl
- Martin Kenney
- Franz Tödtling
- Michael Fritsch
- David B. Audretsch
- Erkko Autio
In Sociology and Political Science
- Franz Tödtling
- Michaela Trippl
- Donald S. Siegel
- Mike Wright
- Olga Memedović
- Martin Kenney
- Philip Cooke
- Michael Fritsch
Citations in the corpus
- Contests for Cooperation - A New Approach in German Innovation Policy (2005, background): “The BioRegio contest was designed to stimulate cooperation and division of innovative labor between private firms, universities, non-university research institutes, and venture capitalists in certain regions.”
- The Impact of R&D Subsidies on Firm Innovation (2016, background): “…place-based policies recently implemented in Europe to promote clusters of innovative activities are evaluated by Albert et al. (2002) for France, Dohse (2000) for Germany and Viladecans-Marsal and Arauzo-Carod (2012) for Spain, while the effects of placedbased policies in the United States are…”
- Regional Innovation Systems: General Findings and Some New Evidence from Biotechnology Clusters (2002, background): “Space does not permit an analysis of this interesting federal-regional (state or land) initiative, (but see Cooke, 2002; Dohse, 2000 ).The paper reflects upon the limitations and capabilities of regional innovation systems in the context, biotechnology, where local, national and global influences a”
- Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context (2014, background): “For example, during the last 30 years the German government has pursued policies to foster the development of a biotechnology industry and technological context (Jasanoff, 1985; Giesecke, 2000; Dohse, 2000).”
- Regional collaborations and indigenous innovation capabilities in China: A multivariate method for the analysis of regional innovation systems (2015, background): “These intermediaries act as important instruments to realise interaction amongst innovation actors [61].”
- Financing technology-based small firms in Europe: what do we know? (2012, background): “30 This program awarded monetary prizes to the regions offering the best regional commercialization networks of biotechnology (Casper 2000, Dohse 2000, Lehrer and Asakawa 2004). angels networks.”
- NEW ECONOMY INNOVATION SYSTEMS: BIOTECHNOLOGY IN EUROPE AND THE USA (2001, background): “Hence, until the successful launch of BioRegio, this federal biotechnology cluster-building and commercialization contest (Dohse 2000), it could be said that, almost in spite of Germany’s corporatist political culture, close co-operation and clear communication channels between government, industry…”
- Strategies for regional innovation systems : learning transfer and applications (2003, background): “The winning regions were Munich in Bavaria, Cologne-Düsseldorf in North Rhine-Westphalia, and Heidelberg in Baden-Württemberg (Dohse, 2000).”
- What drives patent performance of German biotech firms? The impact of R&D subsidies, knowledge networks and their location (2011, unknown): “BioRegio competition (Dohse 2000).”
- Developing Biotechnology Clusters in Non‐high Technology Regions—The Case of Austria (2007, methodology): “…or latecoming regions, the rise of biotechnology clusters is likely to follow a different development path, revealing a stronger role of policy (Dohse, 2000; Eickelpasch and Fritsch, 2005; Rosson and McLarney, 2005) and a higher importance of distant knowledge sources (Leibovitz, 2004; Rees,…”