Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses.

By H. Breiter, Itzhak Aharon, Daniel Kahneman, A. M. Dale, Peter Shizgal. Neuron, 2001

1,376 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8215a5cd71b4ad28a3edff694885ed40d2fbf776

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Orbitofrontal cortex tracks positive mood in mothers viewing pictures of their newborn infants (2004, neutral): “…2001; McClure et al., 2003; O'Doherty et al., 2001b, 2002, 2003a; Small et al., 2001), smell (Anderson et al., 2003; O'Doherty et al., 2000), money (Breiter et al., 2001; Elliott et al., 2000, 2003; Knutson et al., 2001b; O'Doherty et al., 2001a; Thut et al., 1997), nonmonetary gambling (Rogers et…”
Triadic model of the neurobiology of motivated behavior in adolescence (2005, background): “…activity in response to aversive stimuli in monkeys (Amaral et al. 1992; Joseph et al. 2003), and the weaker response of ventral striatum to aversive stimuli relative to appetitive stimuli in human functional neuroimaging studies (Breiter et al. 2001; Knutson et al. 2001a, b ; Reuter et al. 2005).”
Choice: Towards a Standard Back-pocket Model (2009, background): “The existence of multiple neurotransmissive systems was revealed in 1964, when Dahlström and Fuxe (1964) visualized adrenaline-, noradrenaline-, and dopamine-containing neurons.”
Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics (2003, methodology): “Also, Player 2 must believe that (i) Player 1 made a deliberate choice to make this outcome possible, and (ii) incurred an opportunity cost in doing so, i.e., gave up a smaller certain payoff risking a still smaller payoff if C is not attained.”
The rewards of music listening: Response and physiological connectivity of the mesolimbic system (2005, background): “However, research in many different domains of basic and clinical neuroscience has shown that the nucleus accumbens (NAc) is one of the prominent brain areas involved in processing rewarding and pleasure-evoking stimuli (Breiter et al., 2001; Knutson et al., 2001).”
Defining the Neural Mechanisms of Probabilistic Reversal Learning Using Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (2002, methodology): “Functional evidence implicates the orbitofrontal cortex, in interaction with the amygdala, in unconditioned (and conditioned) reward processing (Delgado et al., 2000; Breiter et al., 2001; Knutson et al., 2001; O’Doherty et al., 2001).”
Activity in human reward-sensitive brain areas is strongly context dependent (2005, methodology): “, 2004), and secondary reinforcement such as monetary gains and losses (Breiter et al., 2001; Delgado et al., 2004; Elliott et al., 2000; Holroyd et al., 2004b; Thut et al., 1997).”
Neural correlates of individual ratings of emotional salience: a trial-related fMRI study (2004, background): “The NAcc has been posited to play complex reward functions, including the assessment of reward expectancy (Berns et al., 1997; Breiter et al., 2001; Knutson et al., 2001).”
Dysfunction of ventral striatal reward prediction in schizophrenia (2006, methodology): “Functional MRI data were then analyzed in the context of the general linear model (GLM) (Friston et al., 1995) as time series, modeled using the gamma-variate function described by Cohen (1997) and similar to Knutson et al. (2001) and Breiter et al. (2001) .”
Distributed Neural Representation of Expected Value (2005, background): “Although previous fMRI research has examined brain activity during anticipation of incentives (Breiter et al., 2001; Knutson et al., 2001a; O'Doherty et al., 2002), investigators have not yet simultaneously varied expected incentive valence (VAL), magnitude, and probability and observed their…”
Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. (2001, methodology): “…is preted to respond to salient sensory events, regardless a scale that is constant across all images presented. of their relationship to reward (Breiter et al., 2001; Hor- Further work is needed in order to better understand if vitz, 2000). the rating task results are a response language…”