Brain activation associated with evaluative processes of guilt and embarrassment: an fMRI study
By Hidehiko Takahashi, N. Yahata, M. Koeda, T. Matsuda, K. Asai, Y. Okubo. NeuroImage, 2004
366 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81e8b638ed10e577bc08db2bbec5a4eef0f4ca77
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Azim Shariff
- Grit Hein
- Jessica L. Tracy
- Matthew L. Dixon
- Rebecca M. Todd
- Ravi Thiruchselvam
- Robin I. M. Dunbar
- Malia F. Mason
In Social Psychology
- Azim Shariff
- Jessica L. Tracy
- Joey T. Cheng
- Paul Gilbert
- Frances A. Maratos
- Helen Rockliff
- Robin I. M. Dunbar
- Malia F. Mason
Citations in the corpus
- Emotion and the Prefrontal Cortex: An Integrative Review (2017, background): “Another study found RMPFC activation when participants read sentences about themselves engaging in actions that were likely to elicit embarrassment or guilt relative to actions that were affectively neutral (Takahashi et al., 2004).”
- Moral Reputation: An Evolutionary and Cognitive Perspective (2012, background): “Shame more than guilt goes with brain activity in areas involved in mindreading (Takahashi et al., 2004).”
- Virtual Reality for Enhanced Ecological Validity and Experimental Control in the Clinical, Affective and Social Neurosciences (2015, neutral): “(Berthoz et al., 2002; Takahashi et al., 2004).”
- A Naturalist’s View of Pride (2010, result): “…given previous findings of mPFC activity during experiences of negative selfconscious emotions such as embarrassment, guilt, and shame, as well as research indicating that the mPFC is central to selfreferential thought (e.g., Fossati et al., 2003; Kircher et al., 2002; Takahashi et al., 2004).”
- Superior Temporal SulcusIt's My Area: Or Is It? (2008, result): “In line with the network assumption, four of the five studies in the ‘‘ToM’’ category (Kobayashi et al., 2007; Voellm et al., 2006; Takahashi et al., 2004; Gallagher et al., 2000) report medial prefrontal activity together with STS activation, whereas STS activity in speech processing was more accom”
- The Importance of Emotions for the Effectiveness of Social Punishment (2006, background): “That these are indeed reliable can be deduced from a recent neuroimaging study (Takahashi et al., 2004) that showed correlations of self reported guilt ratings and activation of theory of mind related brain areas (i.e. medial prefrontal cortex and posterior superior temporal sulcus).6 For all these…”
- The Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Judgment (2010, background): “Thus, the activity observed in this network during the contemplation of dilemmas involving “personal” harm is probably related to the fact that these stimuli involve such non-sensory representations, although this alone does not explain why “personal” dilemmas engage this network more than…”
- Having a word with yourself: Neural correlates of self-criticism and self-reassurance (2010, background): “, 2008), whilst negative self-conscious emotions of guilt and embarrassment also activated the temporal poles (Takahashi et al., 2004).”
- Neural mechanisms of social influence (2009, background): “Particularly relevant to the present investigation is fMRI evidence that the mPFC plays a role in the processing of social norms, including perceiving norm violations (Berthoz, Armony, Blair, & Dolan, 2002) and experiencing embarrassment or guilt for the social norm transgressions of others (Takahas”
- Ventromedial prefrontal volume predicts understanding of others and social network size (2011, background): “, 2010), and was also more active during the social emotion of embarrassment, in which one typically metalizes about the thoughts and reactions of others, than during the less social emotion of guilt (Takahashi et al., 2004).”