Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation center

By E. Nora, B. Lajoie, Edda G. Schulz, L. Giorgetti, I. Okamoto, N. Servant, T. Piolot, Nynke L. van Berkum, Johannes Meisig, J. Sedat and 5 more. Nature, 2012

2,846 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In eukaryotes transcriptional regulation often involves multiple long-range elements and is influenced by the genomic environment. A prime example of this concerns the mouse X-inactivation centre (Xic), which orchestrates the initiation of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) by controlling the expression of the non-protein-coding Xist transcript. The extent of Xic sequences required for the proper regulation of Xist remains unknown. Here we use chromosome conformation capture carbon-copy (5C) and super-resolution microscopy to analyse the spatial organization of a 4.5-megabases (Mb) region including Xist. We discover a series of discrete 200-kilobase to 1 Mb topologically associating domains (TADs), present both before and after cell differentiation and on the active and inactive X. TADs align with, but do not rely on, several domain-wide features of the epigenome, such as H3K27me3 or H3K9me2 blocks and lamina-associated domains. TADs also align with coordinately regulated gene clusters. Disruption of a TAD boundary causes ectopic chromosomal contacts and long-range transcriptional misregulation. The Xist/Tsix sense/antisense unit illustrates how TADs enable the spatial segregation of oppositely regulated chromosomal neighbourhoods, with the respective promoters of Xist and Tsix lying in adjacent TADs, each containing their known positive regulators. We identify a novel distal regulatory region of Tsix within its TAD, which produces a long intervening RNA, Linx. In addition to uncovering a new principle of cis-regulatory architecture of mammalian chromosomes, our study sets the stage for the full genetic dissection of the X-inactivation centre.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81d97d4312784cb41046e7813ae54762a5fcbc6e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Leonid A. Mirny
  2. W. de Laat
  3. Richard A. Young
  4. Bing Ren
  5. Edith Heard
  6. Erik Splinter
  7. Stefan Mundlos
  8. Ming Hu

In Molecular Biology

  1. Richard A. Young
  2. Leonid A. Mirny
  3. Bing Ren
  4. Nezar Abdennur
  5. William Stafford Noble
  6. Job Dekker
  7. Denes Hnisz
  8. Anthony D. Schmitt

Citations in the corpus