Surgical implantation of telemetry transmitters in fish: how much have we learned?

By N. Jepsen, A. Koed, E. Thorstad, E. Baras. Hydrobiologia, 2002

368 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81d4cecbe86f99b4f9fab96d20f1c903d3c135c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. Robert Arlinghaus
2. S. Cooke
3. M. Donaldson
4. F. Økland
5. E. Thorstad
6. Ahmet Alp
7. K. Hanson
8. Richard S. Brown

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. S. Cooke
2. Robert Arlinghaus
3. M. Donaldson
4. K. Hanson
5. E. Thorstad
6. F. Økland
7. A. Rikardsen
8. J. Thiem

Citations in the corpus

• Maximum tag to body size ratios for an endangered coho salmon (O. kisutch) stock based on physiology and performance (2008, background): “Jepsen et al. (2002) stated that “few studies have systematically investigated the effects of different tag to body weight ratios”.”
• Tracking animals in freshwater with electronic tags: past, present and future (2013, background): “search efforts have focused on identifying the maximum tag burdens for a range of taxa (including turtles, fish and amphibians), testing and optimizing tagging techniques, assessing different tag types, [123,124], testing anaesthetics (for example, for turtles [125] and fish [126]), and identifying ”
• Enhancing catch‐and‐release science with biotelemetry (2008, background): “Identifying methodological vs. experimental consequences is a difficult task with biotelemetry (Jepsen et al. 2002; Bridger and Booth 2003; Cooke et al. 2004c; Wagner and Cooke 2005).”
• Advancing the surgical implantation of electronic tags in fish: a gap analysis and research agenda based on a review of trends in intracoelomic tagging effects studies (2011, methodology): “To supplement the list and ensure that the search was comprehensive, a Cited Reference Search in Web of Science on November 15, 2009 was also used with a focus on Jepsen et al. (2002) and Bridger and Booth (2003), two of the most-cited review papers on surgical techniques.”
• Evaluation of PIT-tagging in cyprinids (2005, background): “Adverse effects due to handling and tagging may be temperature dependent (Jepsen et al., 2002).”
• An Evaluation of the Maximum Tag Burden for Implantation of Acoustic Transmitters in Juvenile Chinook Salmon (2010, background): “swimming ability, predator avoidance, and buoyancy) to determine the effects of acoustic microtransmitter and PIT-tag implantation on fishes (Brown et al. 1999; Jepsen et al. 2002; Jepsen et al. 2004).”
• Factors affecting the within-river spawning migration of Atlantic salmon, with emphasis on human impacts (2008, positive): “Furthermore, it is important to minimise the impacts of the capture, handling and tagging procedures on the fish, to avoid biasing the study (reviewed by Jepsen et al. 2002; 2005b; Bridger and Booth 2003).”
• The Use of Electronic Tags in Fish Research - An Overview of Fish Telemetry Methods (2013, methodology): “There are three main methods for attaching electronic tags to fish, which are 1) surgical implantation in the body cavity, 2) external attachment, and 3) gastric insertion via the mouth (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Table 1) (Jepsen et al., 2002; Bridger and Booth, 2003; Cooke et al., 2011a).”