Maximum tag to body size ratios for an endangered coho salmon (O. kisutch) stock based on physiology and performance

By C. Chittenden, K. Butterworth, K. F. Cubitt, M. Jacobs, A. Ladouceur, D. Welch, R. Mckinley. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 2008

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/444ba2390a38dab54b74662d0ebc0ec44a0c3036

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. S. Cooke
2. J. Nielsen
3. Christa M. Woodley
4. C. Suski
5. Frederic Bartumeus

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Christa M. Woodley
2. Richard S. Brown
3. J. Nielsen
4. M. Brad Eppard
5. S. Cooke
6. Robert Arlinghaus
7. S. Hinch
8. A. Danylchuk

In Water Science and Technology

1. S. Cooke

Citations in the corpus

• Advancing the surgical implantation of electronic tags in fish: a gap analysis and research agenda based on a review of trends in intracoelomic tagging effects studies (2011, background): “Fortyseven studies focused on surgical implantation of salmonids (e.g., rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss [Lucas 1989; Brown et al. 1999]; Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha [Adams et al. 1998a, b]; cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus clarkii [Sanderson and Hubert 2007]; brown trout, Salmo trutta [”
• An Evaluation of the Maximum Tag Burden for Implantation of Acoustic Transmitters in Juvenile Chinook Salmon (2010, background): “…that acoustic transmitters and PIT tags had negative effects on the survival of juvenile Chinook salmon when tag burdens were 6.7% or more, which accords with the recommended maximum tag burdens for juvenile coho salmon (7%; Chittenden et al. 2009) and Atlantic salmon (8%; Lacroix et al. 2004).”