Advancing the surgical implantation of electronic tags in fish: a gap analysis and research agenda based on a review of trends in intracoelomic tagging effects studies

By S. Cooke, Christa M. Woodley, M. Brad Eppard, Richard S. Brown, J. Nielsen. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2011

280 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86666cd4b248a15bf9a04f662eff5fbb3e42d485

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. S. Cooke
2. S. Hinch
3. M. Donaldson
4. G. Raby
5. J. Brownscombe
6. J. Thiem
7. E. Thorstad
8. F. Økland

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. S. Cooke
2. S. Hinch
3. M. Donaldson
4. G. Raby
5. E. Thorstad
6. F. Økland
7. J. Brownscombe
8. A. Rikardsen

Citations in the corpus

• The Use of Electronic Tags in Fish Research - An Overview of Fish Telemetry Methods (2013, methodology): “Surgical implantation in the body cavity is the most commonly used tagging method for electronic tags in fish (Cooke et al., 2011a).”
• Conducting and interpreting fish telemetry studies: considerations for researchers and resource managers (2019, background): “Most studies examining tagging effects of intracoelomic implantation have focused on freshwater species and typically in laboratories (Cooke et al. 2011b).”
• Ocean Tracking Network Canada: A Network Approach to Addressing Critical Issues in Fisheries and Resource Management with Implications for Ocean Governance (2011, background): “Such tagging validation studies are essential to ensure that data arising from tagged individuals are representative of untagged conspecifics (Cooke et al. 2011).”
• The role of temperature in the capture and release of fish (2013, methodology): “If methodologies are carefully chosen (e.g. using proven surgical techniques and transmitter specifications for the specific study animals and choosing study designs with appropriate control and sham treatments and adequate statistical power; Cooke et al. 2011), effects should be minimal and the ben”
• Tracking animals in freshwater with electronic tags: past, present and future (2013, background): “More so than in marine environments, significant effort has been devoted to the development and validation of various attachment and implantation procedures (includi g pre- and posttagging care), particularly for fish (reviewed in [58,120,121]) but also for reptil es [122].”
• Effective monitoring of freshwater fish (2019, background): “For example, biotelemetry using acoustic, radio, or passive integrated transponder tags (Cooke et al., 2011; Thiem et al., 2011) can reveal individual variability in movements and behaviours within and between populations (Lucas & Batley, 1996), elucidate population mixing and gene flow (Huey et…”