The psychological roots of intellectual humility: The role of intelligence and cognitive flexibility
By Leor Zmigrod, S. Zmigrod, Peter J. Rentfrow, Trevor W. Robbins. Personality and Individual Differences, 2019
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Intellectual humility has been identified as a character virtue that allows individuals to recognize their own potential fallibility when forming and revising attitudes. Intellectual humility is therefore essential for avoiding confirmation biases when reasoning about evidence and evaluating beliefs. The present study investigated the cognitive correlates of intellectual humility. The results indicate that cognitive flexibility, measured with objective behavioural assessments, predicted intellectual humility. Intelligence was also predictive of intellectual humility. These relationships were particularly pronounced for the facets of intellectual humility associated with respect for opposing opinions and openness to revising one's attitudes in light of new evidence. The data revealed an interaction: high cognitive flexibility is particularly valuable for intellectual humility in the context of low intelligence, and reciprocally, high intelligence was beneficial for intellectual humility in the context of low flexibility. Notably, there was evidence of a compensatory effect, as participants who scored highly on both flexibility and intelligence did not exhibit superior intellectual humility relative to individuals who scored highly on only one of these cognitive traits. These findings are suggestive of dual psychological pathways to intellectual humility; either cognitive flexibility or intelligence are sufficient for high intellectual humility, but neither is necessary.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78e85c7ff6e16a6ffeca4eeec1229ecc95a5044b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Political Science and International Relations
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- The role of cognitive rigidity in political ideologies: theory, evidence, and future directions (2020, result): “This is consistent with research in other ideological domains demonstrating that objectively assessed cognitive inflexibility is related to greater ideological thinking in the realms of nationalism [18 ], religiosity [58], extremist attitudes [24], and general dogmatism [23].”