Collective action for market chain innovation in the Andes

By A. Devaux, D. Horton, C. Velasco, G. Thiele, G. López, T. Bernet, Iván Reinoso, M. Ordinola. 2009

300 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80f250c3e3cdd55d92b528f1fd4cd15147963e22

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. L. Klerkx
2. C. Leeuwis
3. B. Shiferaw
4. C. Kilelu
5. Ruerd Ruben
6. J. Hellin
7. N. Aarts
8. A. Devaux

In Plant Science

1. L. Klerkx
2. C. Leeuwis
3. Ruerd Ruben
4. J. Hellin
5. B. Shiferaw
6. R. Muradian
7. G. Muricho
8. R. Fort

In Strategy and Management

1. C. Leeuwis
2. N. Aarts
3. C. Kilelu
4. L. Klerkx
5. Ruerd Ruben
6. M. Dickson
7. J. Hellin
8. D. Horton

Citations in the corpus

• Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment (2010, background): “…(AIS) thinking has become an increasingly applied framework to analyze technological, economical and institutional change in agriculture (e.g. Hall et al., 2003; Morriss et al., 2006; Spielman et al., 2008; Devaux et al., 2009; see also Spielman et al. (2009), for an overview of its applications).”
• Improving market access and agricultural productivity growth in Africa: what role for producer organizations and collective action institutions? (2011, background): “…obtain the necessary market information, secure access to new technologies, and tap into high value markets, allowing them to compete with the owners of larger farms and agribusinesses (Stockbridge et al. 2003; Kruijssen et al. 2007; Devaux et al. 2009; Narrod et al. 2009; Kaganzi et al. 2009).”
• Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme (2013, background): “Following the AIS perspective, the importance of recognizing and stimulating co-evolution has been noted as key to promoting smallhol der agricultural development in SSA, and interventi ons increasingly focus on supporting interactio n among multiple actors at different levels in agricultural produc”
• Multi-stakeholder platforms for linking small farmers to value chains: evidence from the Andes (2011, methodology): “Papa Andina encouraged the development of the platform concepts and cross learning between partners (Thiele et al., 2007; Devaux et al., 2009).”
• Agricultural Extension, Collective Action and Innovation Systems: Lessons on Network Brokering from Peru and Mexico (2012, background): “Devaux et al. (2009) note that in most types of collective action, appropriate leadership is important, but the particular traits of leaders may vary.”
• How is innovation in aquaculture conceptualized and managed? A systematic literature review and reflection framework to inform analysis and action (2017, background): “This body of literature, widely applied in agriculture (Ayele et al., 2012; Devaux et al., 2009; Trienekens, 2011), focuses on institutional frameworks and value chain governance, shaped by the actors present at regional, national, and local level (Gereffi et al., 2005; Gibbon et al., 2008).”
• Agricultural innovation and inclusive value-chain development: a review (2018, background): “Devaux et al. (2009) present the case of the Papa Andina network in the Andes which used collective action in two approaches for fostering market chain innovation: the participatory market chain approach and stakeholder platforms.”
• Cooperative membership and dairy performance among smallholders in Ethiopia (2016, background): “There are some empirical studies reporting that agricultural cooperatives have been instrumental in the creation of new vertical marketing linkages (Devaux et al., 2009; Jia and Huang, 2011; Stattman and Mol, 2014) and the emergence of new international market channels (with stric- ter quality…”
• A Review of Ecosystem Services, Farmer Livelihoods, and Value Chains in Shade Coffee Agroecosystems (2011, unknown): “We chose to examine the percent of protected area within 10 km and 50 km distances from coffee area, since organisms like birds, bats, and bees in tropical habitats disperse across short and long distances (Dick et al. 2008).”