Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment
By L. Klerkx, N. Aarts, C. Leeuwis. 2010
786 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Science Applications, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c25d11a1ef7130794efbceda6f1cb181851a072
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Science Applications
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- RAAIS: Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (Part I). A diagnostic tool for integrated analysis of complex problems and innovation capacity (2015, background): “Such changes occur across different levels (e.g. field, farm, region), and are shaped by interactions between stakeholders and organisations inside and outside the agricultural sector (Kilelu et al., 2013; Klerkx et al., 2010).”
- How mismatching institutional logics hinder niche–regime interaction and how boundary spanners intervene (2015, background): “This role of consultants was also observed by Klerkx et al. (2010).”
- Systemic perspectives on scaling agricultural innovations. A review (2016, background): “…issue have led some to advocate for participatory design and best-fit options, requiring processes of adaptation and translation (Cerf et al. 2012; Garb and Friedlander 2014; Giller et al. 2011; Klerkx et al. 2010; Knowler and Bradshaw 2007; Shiferaw et al. 2009; van der Stoep and Strijbos 2011).”
- Information networks that generate economic value: a study on clusters of adopters of new or improved technologies and practices among oil palm growers in Mexico. (2015, background): “Rather, innovation and change at the farm level is the result of a complex, dynamic and interactive process that occurs within a heterogeneous set of actors (Klerkx et al., 2010; Muñoz and Santoyo, 2010; Radjou, 2004).”
- Dynamics and distribution of public and private research and extension roles for technological innovation and diffusion: Case studies of the implementation and adaptation of precision farming technologies (2017, background): “Successful technological innovation and diffusion depends upon factors such as technology development, but also on complementary social innovation in the form of institutional change, supply chain reorganization, market development and creating societal acceptance (Klerkx et al., 2010).”
- Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme (2013, background): “Conducive institutional conditions enhancing collaboratio n for institutiona l change, or conversel y a lack of them, have been underlined as key elements that enable or constrain innovation (Hounkonnou et al., 2012; Klerkx et al., 2010; Leeuwis and van den Ban, 2004; Roep et al., 2003 ).”
- The Multi-Level Perspective in Research on Sustainability Transitions in Agriculture and Food Systems: A Systematic Review (2019, background): “Linking processes can involve networking niche actors and regime entities [127], reinvention and adaptation [105], translation [123], hybridization of niche experiments and regime practices in multi-actor forums [86,126].”
- Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instruments – Assessing their contribution to innovation system function dynamics (2019, methodology): “This idea is further elaborated upon by two commercial companies under the umbrella of the TransForum innovation programme (Groot Koerkamp and Bos, 2008; Klerkx et al., 2010).”
- Systems approaches to innovation in crop protection. A systematic literature review (2014, background): “…of the AIS approach, authors mention the involvement of multiple actors and organisations representing local, national, regional and global levels in learning platforms and networks (Brooks and Loevinsohn, 2011; Gijsbers and van Tulder, 2011; Klerkx et al., 2010, 2012b; Leitgeb et al., 2011).”
- Enhancing innovation in livestock value chains through networks: Lessons from fodder innovation case studies in developing countries (2012, background): “ganizations (Klerkx et al. 2010) but this seems a long way”
- An innovation systems approach to institutional change: Smallholder development in West Africa (2012, background): “Innovation brokers (Klerkx et al., 2009; Klerkx et al., 2010) can help mediate such interaction.”
- Ecological intensification of agriculture — sustainable by nature (2014, background): “The role of local resources and indigenous knowledge is also recognised, so that farmers are not mere adopters of technologies; they generate locally adapted knowledge and technologies [28,29].”