Soils as agents of selection: feedbacks between plants and soils alter seedling survival and performance

By Clara C. Pregitzer, J. Bailey, S. Hart, J. Schweitzer. Evolutionary Ecology, 2010

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Soils are one of the first selective environments a seed experiences and yet little is known about the evolutionary consequences of plant-soil feedbacks. We have previously found that plant phytochemical traits in a model system, Populus spp., influence rates of leaf litter decay, soil microbial communities and rates of soil net nitrogen mineralization. Utilizing this natural variation in plant-soil linkages we examined two related hypotheses: (1) Populus angustifolia seedlings are locally adapted to their native soils; and (2) Soils act as agents of selection, differentially affecting seedling survival and the heritability of plant traits. We conducted a greenhouse experiment by planting seedlings from 20 randomly collected P. angustifolia genetic families in soils conditioned by various Populus species and measured subsequent survival and performance. Even though P. angustifolia soils are less fertile overall, P. angustifolia seedlings grown in these soils were twice as likely to survive, grew 24% taller, had 27% more leaves, and 29% greater above-ground biomass than P. angustifolia seedlings grown in non-native P. fremontii or hybrid soils. Increased survival resulted in higher trait variation among seedlings in native soils compared to seedlings grown in non-native soils. Soil microbial biomass varied significantly across soil environments which could explain more of the variation in seedling performance than soil texture, pH, or nutrient availability, suggesting strong microbial interactions and feedbacks between plants, soils, and associated microorganisms. Overall, these data suggest that a “home-field advantage” or a positive plant soil feedback helps maintain genetic variance in P. angustifolia seedlings.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1096bac80021298ecce62d6979154b23a984a1d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. W. H. van der Putten
  2. R. Bardgett
  3. T. Martijn Bezemer
  4. James D. Bever
  5. David A. Wardle
  6. Paul Kardol
  7. A. Kulmatiski
  8. T. Fukami

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. W. H. van der Putten
  2. R. Bardgett
  3. David A. Wardle
  4. T. Martijn Bezemer
  5. T. Fukami
  6. Paul Kardol
  7. James D. Bever
  8. Tess F. J. van de Voorde

In Plant Science

  1. W. H. van der Putten
  2. R. Bardgett
  3. T. Martijn Bezemer
  4. T. Fukami
  5. A. Kulmatiski
  6. James D. Bever
  7. David A. Wardle
  8. Paul Kardol

Citations in the corpus