Liquidity Events and the Geographic Distribution of Entrepreneurial Activity
By Toby E. Stuart, Olav Sorenson. 2003
470 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/803e17564500bc5c5809688e812c807eb2344242
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Ethan Mollick
- Johan Wiklund
- David B. Audretsch
- Karl J. Wennberg
- David H. Hsu
- Mike Wright
- Toby E. Stuart
- Olav Sorenson
In Economics and Econometrics
- Adrien Matray
- Lee Fleming
- Johan Wiklund
- Karl J. Wennberg
- Matt Marx
- David B. Audretsch
- Jasjit Singh
- Ethan Mollick
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- David B. Audretsch
- Ethan Mollick
- David H. Hsu
- Karl J. Wennberg
- Johan Wiklund
- Toby E. Stuart
- Olav Sorenson
- Lee Fleming
Citations in the corpus
- Community Isomorphism and Corporate Social Action (2007, methodology): “Our definition of community includes both the inner city and the surrounding suburban ring, a unit of analysis consistent with the extant literature (e.g., Marquis, 2003; Stuart & Sorenson, 2003).”
- Founder Replacement and Startup Performance (2018, background): “The literature on non-competes does not address this possibility empirically, instead focusing on how such contracts affect the founding of new firms and their early growth (see Stuart and Sorenson (2003); Samila and Sorenson (2011); Starr, Balasubramanian and Sakakibara (2015)).”
- Venture Capitalists and Cooperative Start-up Commercialization Strategy (2004, background): “In sum, while SBIR and VC represent different funding sources, controlled comparisons of projects funded by each will help us isolate the effect of VC association on start-up commercialization strategy.”
- The Effectiveness of University Knowledge Spillovers: Performance Differences between University Spinoffs and Corporate Spinoffs (2011, background): “An obvious potential policy variable to consider is non-compete covenants (Folta et al., 2010; Stuart and Sorenson, 2003).”
- The dynamic impact of innovative capability and inter-firm network on firm valuation: A longitudinal study of biotechnology start-ups (2010, background): “…ultimate outcome of wealth creation for the entrepreneurial team that may serve to motivate entrepreneurial behavior and spawn other new ventures (Stuart and Sorenson, 2003), enhance investor support and confidence (Nicholson et al., 2005), or increase the likelihood of subsequent partnering…”
- Home Bias in Online Investments: An Empirical Study of an Online Crowdfunding Market (2016, unknown): “For example, to what extent can crowdfunding mitigate the underinvestment in entrepreneurs?31 Because of information asymmetry, entrepreneurs frequently rely on geographically close individuals, banks, or venture capitalists (Stuart and Sorenson 2003).”
- The local innovation spillovers of listed firms (2021, methodology): “Marshall (1890) is among the first to notice that social interactions among workers create learning opportunities that enhance their productivity.”
- Is Pay for Performance Detrimental to Innovation? (2009, unknown): “83.”
- Mobility, Skills, and the Michigan Non-Compete Experiment (2009, background): “Noncompetes appear to be nearly universal in employment contracts (LaVan 2000; Kaplan and Stromberg 2001; Stuart and Sorenson 2003), yet the components of non-competition law have not changed materially for centuries.”