Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research

By Youngjin Yoo, Ola Henfridsson, Kalle J. Lyytinen. Information systems research, 2010

2,659 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e488326735cac3b5f830aa5f542f78eda74de85

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software App Developers and Patterns of Innovation (2012, neutral): “Thus, digital platforms have been described as a means of potentially “democratizing” digital innovation (Yoo et al. 2010).”
Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda (2021, positive): “…& Picot, 2015; Matt et al., 2015; Parviainen et al., 2017; Tan & Pan, 2003; Whelan, Golden, & Donnellan, 2013; Xue, Zhang, Ling, & Zhao, 2013; Yoo et al., 2010; Zhu et al., 2006) (cid:129) Change processes by adding technology (Leviäkangas, 2016; Parviainen et al., 2017) (cid:129) Utilize…”
Technology Ecosystem Governance (2014, background): “Where the stability-evolvability tension has been addressed conceptually in the literature (Yoo et al. 2010, Tilson et al. 2010, Tiwana et al. 2010), the research lacks substantial empirical and theoretical insight into how this tension is manifested, as well as how technology ecosystem governance…”
Pervasive Decentralisation of Digital Infrastructures: A Framework for Blockchain enabled System and Use Case Analysis (2017, background): “We further contribute to the literature on strategic frameworks that identify new sources of value creation in form of digital product platforms [44].”
The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes (2019, background): “From such a perspective, it then becomes imperative that studies incorporate characteristics innate to digital technologies as key explanatory factors in theorizing on the nature and process of innovation and entrepreneurship (Kallinikos et al., 2013; Nambisan, 2017; Yoo et al., 2010).”
Platform Ecosystems: How Developers Invert the Firm (2017, positive): “Despite considerable research on prices, quantities, and network effects, Yoo et al. (2010) note that little formal analysis has investigated broader platform business models.”
The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis (2016, positive): “…on platform-based ecosystems, points us to important dimensions of ‘openness’ of governance, such as control over IP, access to the technology, and also social factors such as transparent information policy (Boudreau 2010; Yoo, Henfridsson, and Lyytinen 2010; Benlian, Hilkert, and Hess 2015).”
How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity (2019, background): “Digital platforms are technologies that allow firms to homogenize, edit, and distribute data on an unprecedented scale (Yoo, Henfridsson, & Lyytinen, 2010).”