Stimulating the Potential: Creative Performance and Communication in Innovation Teams

By Jan Kratzer, Roger Th. A. J. Leenders, J. V. Engelen. 2004

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Mechanical Engineering, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e063161b87812e976c66fc897e3cf438b02cdef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Lauren Christophers
2. Brendan Rooney
3. A. Egan
4. M. V. van Engen
5. Rebecca Maguire
6. Marianne van Woerkom

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Marianne van Woerkom

In Social Psychology

1. A. Egan
2. M. V. van Engen
3. Rebecca Maguire
4. Marcel A. Croon
5. Marianne van Woerkom
6. Maria Christina Meyers

Citations in the corpus

• The relationships between team learning activities and team performance (2009, background): “Although there is no consensus in the literature about a maximum team size, we chose for a cut-off point of 35 team members since large teams tend to segment into subgroups (Kratzer et al., 2004).”
• Social capital and innovation in R&D teams: the mediating roles of psychological safety and learning from mistakes (2013, unknown): “Moreover, socialization processes and shared experiences often develop more homogeneous viewpoints over time among team members (Katz, 1982; Kratzer et al., 2004).”
• Learning from conflicts? The relations between task and relationship conflicts, team learning and team performance (2009, background): “Since large teams tend to segment into subgroups (Kratzer, Leenders, & van Engelen, 2004 ), we chose for a cutoff point a team size of 40 members.”
• Developing creativity in higher education for 21st century learners: A protocol for a scoping review (2017, background): “Links have been made between levels of creativity and other valued skills including critical thinking (Dwyer, Hogan, & Stewart, 2014), as well as communication and innovation (Kratzer et al., 2004).”