Using Content Analysis to Elaborate Adolescent Theories of Organization

By Karan Sonpar, Karen Golden-Biddle. 2008

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d729d1c5440986453dbb26d8448f446f0b9578a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. James C. Hayton
2. G. Cacciotti
3. A. Giazitzoglu
4. Daniela Iubatti
5. J. Mitchell
6. J. Christian Broberg
7. Jeremy C. Short
8. Claudia Cogliser

In Strategy and Management

1. Daniela Iubatti
2. G. Cacciotti
3. James C. Hayton
4. J. Mitchell
5. J. Christian Broberg
6. Jeremy C. Short
7. Claudia Cogliser
8. Keith H. Brigham

Citations in the corpus

• A reconceptualization of fear of failure in entrepreneurship (2016, background): “…analysis is an appropriate strategy for exploring phenomenological data (Gill, 2014) and has significant advantages for moving between inductive and deductive modes of reasoning (Duriau et al., 2007) such as where the development of adolescent theories is the goal (Sonpar and Golden-Biddle, 2008).”
• Construct Validation Using Computer-Aided Text Analysis (CATA) (2010, methodology): “We agree with others who advocated deriving words from prior theory when possible (Dowling & Kabanoff, 1996; Weber, 1990) and agree with organizational scholars who argued that content analysis might be an especially useful tool for examining adolescent theories (Sonpar & Golden-Biddle, 2008).”
• Personal relationships and innovation diffusion in SME networks: A content analysis approach (2012, methodology): “003 nalyzed data using content analysis, a research method scarcely eployed in management and economic literature (Duriau et al., 007; Sonpar and Golden-Biddle, 2008).”