Measuring hedonic impact in animals and infants: microstructure of affective taste reactivity patterns.

By Kent C. Berridge. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 2000

649 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Nutrition and Dietetics, Sensory Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d1e14a144198159f679792d1e73a9bbdfa0ad9a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Nutrition and Dietetics

In Sensory Systems

Citations in the corpus

On the Embodied Neural Nature of Core Emotional Affects (2005, background): “The pleasure of taste is elaborated in lower regions of the brain (Berridge, 2000) than our ability to emotionally over or under respond to qualitative shifts in taste (i.e., contrast effects: when rewards are shifted from higher to lower quality incentives).”
Hedonic Hot Spot in Nucleus Accumbens Shell: Where Do μ-Opioids Cause Increased Hedonic Impact of Sweetness? (2005, methodology): “org as supplemental material) by an observer blind to drug treatment condition following procedures described previously (Berridge, 2000).”
The tempted brain eats: pleasure and desire circuits in obesity and eating disorders. (2010, positive): “Similar elevations of 'wanting' without 'liking' have also been produced in ordinary rats by amphetamine-induced elevation in dopamine release, and by long term drug-sensitization of mesolimbic systems (Peciña et al., 2003; Tindell et al., 2005; Wyvell and Berridge, 2000).”
The neurobiology of positive emotions. (2006, background): “Adult primates as well as rodents also exhibit these hedonic taste reactivity reactions exclusively to highly palatable solutions (Berridge, 2000, 2004).”
The Neuroscience of Natural Rewards: Relevance to Addictive Drugs (2002, background): “Even rats display these reactions to tastes that reflect core affective processes and hedonic neural mechanisms homologous to those of humans (Grill and Norgren, 1978; Berridge, 2000).”
Hedonic Hotspots: Generating Sensory Pleasure in the Brain (2007, positive): “By assigning the behavioral ‘liking’ enhancements we observe to the particular microinjection Fos plumes that cause them, we can map objective and precise plots of hedonic hotspots in the brain (Mahler et al., 2007; Peciña and Berridge, 2000; 2005; Peciña et al., 2006; Smith and Berridge, 2005).”
Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience. (2004, background): “Berridge / Physiology & Behavior 81 ( 2004 ) 179 – 209 204 Hence , perhaps , we need new brain organization con - cepts in addition to hierarchy , especially for forebrain circuits .”
Reward learning: Reinforcement, incentives, and expectations (2000, background): “But the enhanced "wanting" for food is not accompanied by increased "liking," as evidenced by the microinjection's failure to increase positive hedonic patterns of behavior elicited from the rats by a sweet taste (Wyvell & Berridge, 2000 ).”
Facial expressions in school-aged children are a good indicator of 'dislikes', but not of 'likes' (2009, background): “A positive affective reaction is characterized by tongue protrusions, sucking, lip smacking and a relaxed face with sometimes a smile as ultimate extreme (Berridge, 2000; Ganchrow et al., 1983; Steiner, 1973).”
Emotion and motivation (2013, neutral): “The classic demonstration of this theory was by Schachter & Singer (1962).”
What is it like to be a rat? Rat sensory perception and its implications for experimental design and rat welfare (2008, background): “As with humans, sweetness and umami are rewarding, bitterness is usually aversive, and saltiness and sourness are only pleasant at low concentrations (Grill & Norgren, 1978; Berridge, 2000).”
The insectivore’s dilemma, and how to take the West out of it (2015, background): “As distaste is observed in neonates (Berridge, 2000; Morris, 1967; Steiner, 1973; Steiner, Glaser, Hawilo, & Berridge, 2001) as well as in many non-human species (Grill & Norgren, 1978), it is considered to be a hard-wired reaction.”
Intra-Accumbens Amphetamine Increases the Conditioned Incentive Salience of Sucrose Reward: Enhancement of Reward “Wanting” without Enhanced “Liking” or Response Reinforcement (2000, methodology): “…paradigm (Grill and Norgren, 1978) provides a way of specifically assessing the hedonic impact of a sucrose reward by measuring affective reactions elicited by oral infusions of taste stimuli from human infants, apes, monkeys, or rats (Grill and Berridge, 1985; Berridge, 1996, 2000a) (see Fig.”
Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits (2007, background): “Considerable research with the taste reactivity paradigm has demonstrated that interference with DA by systemic administration of DA antagonists, whole forebrain DA depletions, or local depletions of DA in nucleus accumbens or neostriatum, failed to alter appetitive taste reactivity for sucrose (Ber”
Neural systems implicated in delayed and probabilistic reinforcement (2006, background): “, & Berridge, K. C. (2002). The neuroscience of natural rewards: Relevance to addictive drugs.”