Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience.

By Kent C. Berridge. Physiology and Behavior, 2004

1,142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ac0c735f684263eaf21e11af671a5042c3a21d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

A Review of Self-Report and Alternative Approaches in the Measurement of Student Motivation (2009, background): “Although these neural activations are beyond conscious awareness, it is believed that activations in these regions are reflected in emotional states ( Berridge 2004 ).”
Animal welfare with and without consciousness (2017, background): “This anticipatory element of animal behaviour (what Berridge (2004) calls ‘wanting’) is why we need to take into account the possibility that an animal may be physically healthy but still highly motivated to carry out behaviour.”
The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: the case for incentive salience (2007, background): “Just as a small taste of food UCS can prime appetite to eat more, or a small jolt of free brain stimulation or drug reward can prime self-administration of the same reward, conditioned priming by a CS for many of these rewards acts to elicit motivation to obtain the UCS reward (Berridge 2004; Bindra”
Tonic dopamine: opportunity costs and the control of response vigor (2007, positive): “Such effects of “incentive motivation” for the outcome (Dickinson and Balleine 2002; McClure et al. 2003; Berridge 2004) likely also involve temporal discounting (which we have not directly modeled here) by which delayed rewards are viewed as less valuable than proximal ones.”
Individual differences in decision-making (2005, background): “This fits with the idea that persons have in general limited insight into their own motives for behavior (Berridge, 2004; Berridge & Winkielman, 2003; Nisbett & Wilson, 1977; Winkielman & Berridge, 2003).”
Widespread reward-system activation in obese women in response to pictures of high-calorie foods (2008, positive): “Stimuli associated with primary rewards can acquire motivational potency such that they trigger “wanting” of the reward by virtue of their acquired ability to activate the reward system (Berridge, 2004).”
The effect of feeding enrichment toys on the behaviour of kennelled dogs (Canis familiaris) (2008, background): “Typically, animals fed in captivity do not have the potential to display appetitive behaviours that might otherwise be rewarding to them (e.g. Spruijt et al., 2001; Berridge, 2004).”
Navigating Into the Future or Driven by the Past (2013, background): “All the more pity, perhaps, that the idea turns out not to be true” (Berridge, 2004, p. 191).”
A Neural Computational Model of Incentive Salience (2009, background): “feature is precisely why hungers make their relevant cues much more powerful motivators, as well as why a food CS can trigger an increase in appetite for its UCS in a not particularly hungry person or a drug CS trigger relapse in an addict [2–5,7,8,19,89,96,97].”
Neuromodulation as a robot controller (2009, background): “, the motivation process in acquiring an object [13].”
Corticostriatal-hypothalamic circuitry and food motivation: integration of energy, action and reward. (2005, neutral): “[41]).”
as a Robot Controller Neuromodulation as a Robot Controller A Brain-Inspired Strategy for Controlling Autonomous Robots (2009, background): “, the motivation process in acquiring an object [13].”
The Neuromodulatory System: A Framework for Survival and Adaptive Behavior in a Challenging World (2008, background): “…of attentional effort (Baxter & Chiba, 1999), the dopaminergic (DA) system drives reward anticipation (Schultz et al., 1997) and motivation (K. C. Berridge, 2004), and the noradrenergic (NE) system sets the level of response to novel and salient objects (C. W. Berridge & Waterhouse, 2003; Yu &…”
Why Do People Hurt Themselves? A New Conceptual Model of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury (2018, background): “There is no evidence for physiological set points, error detection mechanisms, or a centralized physiological command center (Berridge, 2004; Carpenter, 2004; Ramsay & Woods, 2014).”
An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance (2013, positive): “(See especially Berridge [2004] for a thorough and useful discussion of motivation.)”